Courts Update Supreme Court imposes a cost of Rs 25,000 on...

Supreme Court imposes a cost of Rs 25,000 on Himachal Pradesh for appeal against acquittal in POCSO case after almost 2 years

-

New Delhi Aug 23(ILNS): The Supreme Court, today, imposed a cost of Rs 25000 on the state of Himachal Pradesh for filing an appeal after a delay of 650 days against the acquittal of a man convicted and sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment in a POCSO case. 

A bench comprising of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Hrishikesh Roy reprimanded the Himachal Pradesh government and imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 for showing reluctance in delaying filing a petition before the apex court where the case was of serious allegations in nature. The State government of Himachal Pradesh moved the apex court after 650 days challenging the acquittal of Gorkha Ram passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla.

The Supreme Court ordered this fine amount to be paid to the authorities responsible for the delay in filing the appeal. Apart from this, the Bench also ordered the state government to investigate the matter and fix the responsibility in the appeal. During the hearing of the case, the court told the public prosecutor that there was a delay of six hundred and fifty days in filing the appeal in this case. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul asked the counsel of State that “can you tell when the corona 2019 or 20 came?” The counsel for the state government replied that I will not be able to say for sure. 

Justice Kaul asked what is all this? Such negligence of these officers in appeal. You do not know when the corona epidemic came, the delay in appeal for so many days is not being clarified. The issue of gravity cannot be made a ground for appeal. Why not fix the responsibility of the officials for this?

Gorkha, the respondent herein was convicted by Sessions court of Kangra, Dharamshala for the offense punishable under sections 5(m) and 5(n) of POCSO Act, 2012 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years along with a fine of Rs. 20,000/-.

In a nutshell, the facts of the case are that Komal Parihar was apprised in the meeting of Mahila Mandal at Bhali by some women of the village present there that the appellant Gorkha had been torturing mentally and physically his minor daughters after the death of his wife. Gorkha allegedly tried to develop physical relations with his elder daughter. A FIR against Gorkha got lodged on July 9, 2016. In the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. of the victim recorded by the Investigating Officer, she, however, has completely ruled out the penetrative sexual assault.

The High court was of the view that Investigating Agency has not made any effort to conduct an investigation from a different angle to rule out the possibility of false implication of the accused before filing the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. in the court. The investigation rather has been conducted in a casual and routine manner to implicate the accused in this case by hook and crook.

Vide order dated December 5, 2018, the High Court vide order before setting aside Sessions Court order by acquitting Gorkha from all the charges directed State/Police Department as well as Prosecution Department through learned Advocate General, State of Himachal Pradesh to take remedial steps such as imparting training to the Investigators/Prosecutors and all other duty holders. And also observed that the trial court carried away without ascertaining the genuineness and authenticity of allegations leveled against him after appreciation of the pieces of evidence with great caution and circumspection.

The High Court after examining the evidences, exercising its power as an Appellate Court opined that the prosecution has falsely implicated the accused in this case and thereby not only tarnished the reputation of the accused, who happens to be the father of the victim but also put a question mark on the pious relations between father and a daughter./ILNS/KY/KR/SNG

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Allahabad High Court asks Uttar Pradesh DGP, SIT members to clarify on police inaction in 2019 Mainpuri teen’s hanging

Allahabad Sept 15 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court today in the investigation of the case regarding the...

Delhi High Court adjourns hearing in a plea seeking direction to Centre to appoint a chairperson to PMLA Appellate Tribunal

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Delhi High Court on Tuesday has adjourned its hearing till October 7 in...

SEBI disposes of adjudication proceedings initiated against Yes Bank Limited

Mumbai Sept 15(ILNS): The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) disposed of the instant adjudication proceedings...

Supreme Court issues notice in appeal filed by Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Supreme Court today issued a notice in an appeal filed by the...

Lal Gumbad: Delhi High Court asks ASI, DDA to rid pre-Mughal monument of encroachments

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Delhi High Court, today, asked the Archaeological Survey of India and the...

Bikru encounter: Supreme Court issues notice to UP govt on bail plea of Khushi, sister-in-law of gangster Vikas Dubey

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Supreme Court today issued a notice in a bail plea filed by...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you