Courts Update Shilpa Shetty defamation case: Bombay HC refuses to ban...

Shilpa Shetty defamation case: Bombay HC refuses to ban media, says there’s a ‘judicial limit’ too good, bad journalism

-

Mumbai Jul 30(ILNS): The Bombay High Court today refused to put a blanket ban on media in the case involving Bollywood actor Shilpa Shetty and her husband Raj Kundra, stating that there is a judicial limit on what can be construed as good or bad journalism.

The Bench headed by Justice Gautam Patel passed the order on an interim application filed by Shilpa Shetty against alleged defamatory articles published against her and her family after the arrest of her husband on July 19. Shetty sought directions for media to be restrained from publishing any “incorrect, false, malicious and defamatory” content.

The court noted that the freedom of the press has to be balanced with the right to privacy of an individual, adding that the ban will have a “chilling effect on the freedom of the press”.

“There is a judicial limit on what is good or bad journalism as this comes very close to the freedom of the press. It cannot be like if you (media) are not going to write or say anything nice about me (Shetty) then do not say anything at all. How can this be?” observed Justice Patel.

The Court, however, directed that three videos uploaded on Youtube channels of three private persons be deleted and not uploaded again, as they were “malicious” and did not make even the “slightest attempt to investigate the truth of the matter”.

The videos made comments on Shetty’s moral standing and went on to question the quality of her parenting, following the arrest of her husband Raj Kundra in a case related to alleged production and streaming of pornographic content on apps.

The court noted that most of the articles referred to in the suit, including the one that claimed “Shetty cried and fought with her husband Kundra” when he was brought to their house by the police for joint interrogation, was based on what police sources said.

“Reportage of something based on what police sources have said is not defamatory. If this had happened in the four walls of your house with no one around then the issue is different. But this has happened in the presence of outsiders. How is this defamation?” Justice Patel said.

The actor’s application also sought damages of Rs 25 crore, stating that the respondents (several media publications and social media sites like Google, Facebook, and YouTube) are causing irreparable loss and damage to her reputation. In her plea, Shetty sought directions against social media platforms like Google, YouTube, and Facebook to remove all defamatory content related to her and her family.

To this, Justice Patel said, “Your prayer seeking for social media platforms like Google, YouTube, and Facebook to exercise control over editorial content is dangerous.” The HC directed all defendants in the suit to file their affidavits and posted the matter for further hearing on September 20./ILNS/SV/SNG

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi High Court issues notice to Centre, Defence Ministry on plea challenging curbs on strike by defence personnel

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought response from the Centre and...

Allahabad High Court directs shifting of monkeys to forest within three months for creating upheaval in Varanasi city

Allahabad Sept 16 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has directed to shift the monkeys who created upheaval in Varanasi city,...

Madhya Pradesh High Court disposes of PIL seeking legal action against illegal medical practitioners in Shahdol district

Bhopal Sept 16 (ILNS) The Madhya Pradesh High Court has disposed of a PIL seeking legal action...

CJI Ramana hauls up Centre over forced retirement of NCLAT chairperson

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Thursday came down heavily on...

Delhi High Court directs UIDAI, RBI, Google India Digital Services Private Ltd to respond to PIL alleging unauthorised storage of Aadhaar, banking information by...

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court asked the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), RBI...

Supreme Court refuses PILs on Covid-19 measures due to delay in their listing

New Delhi Sept 16 The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain two PILs seeking directions to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you