Courts Update SC directs private schools to charge 85% of fees...

SC directs private schools to charge 85% of fees due to facilities unutilised by students

-

New Delhi, May 4 (ILNS): The Supreme Court has directed private unaided schools – specifically in Rajasthan – to charge 85% the annual school fees of 2019-20 for the 2020-21 academic year.

This reduction of 15 percent is in lieu of unutilised facilities by students, as fixed under the Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act, 2016.


A Bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari was hearing appeals by school management boards, challenging the constitutional validity of the 2016 Act and the Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Rules, 2017.


Managements of private schools had approached the apex court, challenging the government orders which were upheld by the High Court, regarding the deferment of collection of school fees, including limiting fees to 70 per cent of tuition fees by schools affiliated with the Central Board of Secondary Education and 60 per cent from the schools affiliated with the Rajasthan Board of Secondary Education.


Justice Khanwilkar noted in the verdict: “Undeniably, an unprecedented situation has evolved on account of a complete lockdown due to pandemic. It had serious effect on the individuals, entrepreneurs, industries and the nation as a whole, including in the matter of economy and purchasing capacity of one and all.


“A large number of people have lost their jobs and livelihood, as aftermath of such economic upheaval. The parents, who were under severe stress and even unable to manage their day-to-day affairs and the basic need of their family, made fervent representation to the school Management(s) across the State,” the Judge noted.


It was clarified by the Court that school managements should not debar any student from attending either online classes or physical classes on account of non-payment of fees, arrears/outstanding fees, including installments, referred to above, and should not withhold the results of examinations of any student on that account.

Further, parents could deposit the fees in six instalments before August 5 this year, as per the interim order and schools could individually give more concessions based on specific requests by parents, said the Court.


The Bench held that the Disaster Management Act, 2005 cannot be used by state authorities to issue directions to private parties on economics aspects relating to subsisting contracts.

“The measures enunciated in Section 4 of the Act of 2020 in no way deal with the ‘tariffs’ of air, rail, road, hospital, temporary accommodation. It only enables the authority to prohibit any usage or activities, which the Government considers sufficient to spread or transmit epidemic diseases and for that purpose, to inspect various places suspected of being infected with such diseases.


“Indeed, it can regulate or restrict the functioning of offices, government and private and educational institutions in the state. That, however, would be only in respect of manner of its use and its timings, including to observe standard operating procedures to ensure that epidemic diseases do not transmit or spread on account of activities carried out therein,” read the order.
The Court issued the following directions:
(i) The appellants (Management of the concerned private unaided school) shall collect annual school fees from their students as fixed under the Act of 2016 for the academic year 2019-­20, but by providing deduction of 15 per cent on that amount in lieu of unutilised facilities by the students during the relevant period of academic year 2020­-21.
(ii) The amount so payable by the concerned students be paid in six equal monthly instalments before August 5, 2021, as noted in our order dated February 8, 2021.
(iii) Regardless of the above, it will be open to the appellants (concerned schools) to give further concession to their students or to evolve a different pattern for giving concession.
(iv) The School Management shall not debar any student from attending either online classes or physical classes on account of non­-payment of fees, arrears/outstanding fees, including the instalments, and shall not withhold the results of the examinations of any student on that account.
(v) If any individual request is made by the parent ward, finding it difficult to remit annual fees for the academic year 2020­-21 in the above terms, the school Management to consider such representation on case­ to­-case basis sympathetically.
(vi) The above arrangement will not affect collection of fees for the academic year 2021­-22, as is payable by the students of the concerned school, as and when it becomes due and payable.
(vii) The School Management shall not withhold the name of any student/candidate for the ensuing Board examinations for Classes X and XII on the ground of non­-payment of fee/arrears for the academic year 2020­-21, if any, on obtaining undertaking of the concerned parents/students. ILNS\SHV\SJ\RJ

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

In the age of social media, desecration of the reputation of a public figure has become child’s play. Delhi HC directs Saket Gokhale to...

New Delhi, July 13 (ILNS): The Delhi High Court today directed journalist Saket Gokhale to take down...

PIL in SC seeks stringent rules for rash drivers

New Delhi, Jul 13 (ILNS)A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court, seeking directions...

Can’t drink muddy and contaminated water, even if it is free, says plea in Delhi HC.

New Delhi, Jul 13 (ILNS)The Delhi High Court today asked the Delhi Government to treat the plea...

Sikkim HC directs state govt to strengthen infrastructure for third wave of Pandemic

Sikkim, Jul 13 (ILNS)The Sikkim High Court while hearing its Suo Moto Public Interest Litigation recently, for...

NGT directs DJB to pay Rs Five Lakh per month to CPCB till they control bad odour from Sewage Treatment Plant

New Delhi, Jul 13 (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal today directed the Delhi Jal Board to pay...

Delhi HC directs journalist Saket Gokhale and Twitter to remove defamatory tweets against former Indian diplomat Lakshmi Puri

New Delhi, July 13 (ILNS): The Delhi High Court today directed journalist Saket Gokhale to take down...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you