Breaking News SC adjourns PIL seeking to administer another vaccine approved...

SC adjourns PIL seeking to administer another vaccine approved by WHO as COVAXIN is not permitted for those who wish to travel abroad

-

New Delhi, Oct 29 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today adjourned a PIL seeking permission for 7 crore Indians administered with COVAXIN to get administered with any other vaccine approved by WHO since the petitioner is unable to visit abroad since the same is still being under consideration by WHO.

The bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice BV Nagarathna observed that it will wait till post-Diwali for WHOs approval before moving ahead with any of the directions sought in the PIL. The bench observed that it cannot allow the administration of vaccines again and risk the lives of people without any concrete substance or study. 

The petition states that prior to May 1, 2021, Indian citizens were eligible for administering vaccination in Phases I and II of the vaccination campaign and did not have a choice to choose one particular vaccine. Now, People who have been vaccinated with COVAXIN are unable to travel to other countries for any emergency reasons, be it personal, educational, or any medical emergency since such nations are not considering COVAXIN to be at par with other vaccines like COVISHIELD, PFIZER, etc. Thereby not allowing people vaccinated with COVAXIN to travel abroad. 

The Petitioner is also questioning the Central Government’s actions in launching both COVISHIELD and COVAXIN for use in India on the same day, i.e., on 16.01.2021, when COVAXIN had only recently completed phase-II trials and was in the third phase of trials, with no conclusive efficacy data other than interim efficacy analysis.

The petition averred that there has been a major latent lacuna in the entire vaccination system across the country which involves a lack of awareness attributable to the central government mainly.

“The respondents, at the time of rolling out of COVAXIN for use in the market, failed to make the public aware that it was not approved by the WHO and that it had not even submitted an application before WHO for approval which was submitted as late as in April, 2021. It was only in May 2021 (five months after the commencement of vaccination drive) that is rolled out into the news that several nations are not allowing entry of people vaccinated with vaccines other than those enlisted in WHO’s emergency use list.” 

The Petitioner has prayed before the Apex Court to direct the Ministry of Home to allow those administered with COVAXIN to receive two doses of COVISHIELD in addition until COVAXIN receives approval by WHO which does not appear to be in sight. According to recent statements by Bharat Biotech International Ltd., The WHO has requested additional information from the manufacturer.

Further, the petitioner sought answers from the centre’s concerned departments to issue and release official data, records, timelines, and reasons for the delay in the approval of COVAXIN developed and manufactured by Bharat Biotech and not to detain people who voluntarily, at their own expense and risk, seeks to get administered with COVISHIELD even after receiving two doses of COVAXIN.

The petition further prays, Reasons for giving approval to COVAXIN vaccine for administration to persons in India pending the results of third phase trials of the same; to publish actual data and records submitted to the WHO for the purpose of obtaining approval of WHO in favour of COVAXIN vaccine and issue a statement with reasons in detail delaying the approval of COVAXIN vaccine; to issue a revised Standard of Procedure and guidelines allowing re-vaccination of fully vaccinated persons with another vaccine on voluntary payment of the person at his own risks and costs.

The petitioner who is a Supreme Court advocate Kartik Seth has been waiting for WHO’s approval in order to fly to the United Kingdom with his elderly parents to see and meet his paternal uncle and aunt, both of whom are in their mid-eighties. The Petitioners’ parents are 65 and 71 years old, respectively. It is extremely difficult and uncomfortable for the petitioner to cater with the present situation./ILNS/KR/SNG/

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

SC adjourns PIL seeking to administer another vaccine approved by WHO as COVAXIN is not permitted for those who wish to travel abroad

New Delhi, Oct 29 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today adjourned a PIL seeking permission for 7 crore...

Supreme Court issues notice in Kerala govt appeal against HC order quashing scheme for minority scholarship

New Delhi, Oct 29 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today issued a notice in a plea filed by...

Delhi HC: Cases of foreigners detained solely on the ground of overstay can be considered on a case-to-case basis

The Delhi High Court, on Thursday, refused to entertain a “so-called public interest litigation” seeking deportation to...

Supreme Court adjourns hearing of NGO’s plea challenging 2020 FCRA amendment, SBI rule

New Delhi, Oct 28 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today adjourned a plea filed by Noel Harper, from...

Madras HC dismisses petition of suspended TN Special DGP facing sexual harassment charges

Chennai, Oct 28 (ILNS) The Madras High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition by Rajesh Das, the...

Bombay HC grants bail to Aryan Khan, 2 others, they will be let out tomorrow after the judge pronounces conditions of release

Mumbai, Oct 28 (ILNS) The Bombay High Court today granted bail to Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan’s...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you