Courts Update Revenue authority does not have power to determine the...

Revenue authority does not have power to determine the validity of will considered for mutation: Madhya Pradesh High Court

-

Madhya Pradesh Aug 24(ILNS): The Gwalior Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court recently while disposing of the petition observed that a revenue authority does not have the power to determine the validity of a will while considering an application for mutation.

A Single Bench comprised of Justice Vishal Mishra passed this order while hearing a petition filed by Rajkumar Sharma.

The Petition has been filed challenging the order dated June 28, 2021, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Gwalior Division, whereby the order dated July 25, 2016, passed by the Upper Collector, Datia, and the order dated March 31, 2011, passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhander, District Datia have been quashed thereby mutating the name of respondent in the Revenue Record.

It is submitted that upon the death of Balikdas, the respondent filed an application before the Tahsildar for entering their names in the Revenue Records on the basis of Will.

The Petitioners also filed an application for mutation of their names over the said land on the basis of hereditary succession.

These applications were heard jointly before the Tahsildar and thereafter an application was preferred before the SDO for transferring the matter. The said application was allowed and the SDO order dated March 31, 2011, directed to record the name of the petitioners. Assailing the order dated March 31, 2011, the respondent preferred an appeal before the Upper Collector, District Datia, and the same was dismissed order dated July 25, 2016.

Thereafter, the matter was put forth before the Additional Commissioner challenging both the orders dated March 31, 2011, and July 25, 2016, on the ground that the Balikdas was unmarried and Will was executed in their favor and on the basis of the Will their names deserve to be mutated, whereas, it was the case of the petitioner that since the Balikdas remained unmarried, but having blood relations through males and as per the provision of Section 8(c) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1959 when there is no heir of any of the two classes, then the property shall devolve upon the agnates of the deceased.

It is further submitted that the SDO vide its order dated March 31, 2011, has considered the legal aspect and has passed the order of mutation on this basis and the same was affirmed by the Collector. While in the second appeal, the Additional Collector has failed to appreciate this legal aspect and has passed the impugned order has directed for mutation of name on the basis of will.

It is also submitted that once, the Will on the basis of which the mutation is sought, the same is objected, then no mutation can be done on the basis of Will. The Revenue Authorities have no right to check the genuineness of the Will and mutate the name on the basis of the Will in question, rather, it is the domain of Civil Courts. The person alleging has a mutation on the basis of the Will if the object is required to get the genuineness of the Will checked by filing appropriate proceedings before the Civil Courts.

Counsel for the respondent has opposed the arguments made by the Petitioner stating that the order passed by the Authorities on the basis of the Will is well reasoned and justified order.

In case, Petitioners want their names to be mutated on the basis of succession, then they are required to establish their succession under the Hindu Succession Act and mere entry in the Revenue Records, on the basis of Will, he will not have title over the property in question.

Counsel for the respondent said that they are required to get the title over the suit property in terms of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act. He supports the impugned order and has argued that the same is a well-reasoned order and does not call for any interference in the Petition. He has prayed for dismissal of the same.

The SDO has recorded the names of all the family members only on the basis of success and which was affirmed by the Additional Collector, but the Additional Commissioner has set aside the orders passed by the SDO as well as Additional Collector and has directed for mutation on the basis of the Will. It is not disputed that the will in question is not objected to by the other party.

“Considering the aforesaid, the order passed by the Authorities is bad in law, accordingly, the same is hereby quashed. It is also a settled position that Will is to be proved by leading cogent evidence and the heavy burden is on the propounder of the Will. In such circumstances, the liberty is extended to the respondent to get the Will checked by initiating the proceedings before the Trial Courts”, the Court said while disposing of the Petition./ILNS/AP/SNG

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi HC declines 69-year disabled women’s plea seeking ED, EOW and other probe, for loss of her gas agency due to fraud committed by...

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today declined to hear an appeal filed by...

Appointments for the Tribunals have been made according to the recommendations of Search cum Selection Committee: Center tells SC

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Union Government has filed an affidavit in Apex Court,in the matter...

Delhi High Court issues notice to state govt on minor’s plea seeking permission to donate part of liver to his ailing father

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today sought the response of AAP Government on...

Delhi HC pulls up Kejriwal govt for its lethargic attitude in giving forest clearance for completion of 100-bedded hospital in Najafgarh

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court, on Wednesday, pulled up the state Government over...

NGT forms five member committee to check the legality of construction raised by Omex Ltd and other developers in “The Lake” and other projects...

New Delhi, Sept 15, (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal -principal bench on Monday constituted a five-member joint Committee...

Allahabad HC upholds single judge order, paving way for recruitment of 68,500 assistant teachers in Uttar Pradesh

Allahabad Sept 15 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday, refused to interfere with the decision of...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you