Breaking News Punjab & Haryana HC: Forensic report forms the foundation...

Punjab & Haryana HC: Forensic report forms the foundation of a case under the NDPS Act, and if it’s not there, the entire case of prosecution would fall to the ground

-

Chandigarh, Oct 18 (ILNS) The Punjab and Haryana High Court on October 14, observed that the Forensic report forms the foundation of a case under the NDPS Act and in case, the same is not there, the entire case of prosecution would fall to the ground.

A Single Bench of Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill passed this order while hearing a petition filed by Vinay Kumar @ Vicky.

The Petitioner assails order dated July 5, 2021, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa vide which an application filed by the petitioner under provisions of Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. for grant of bail has been declined.

As per the case of the prosecution on December 20, 2020, when a police party headed by ASI Ashok Kumar was patrolling in the area of village Jandwala Bishnoian, then a tractor was seen coming on the road and the driver of the said tractor upon noticing the police party abruptly tried to turn his tractor towards the fields but in the said process, his tractor stopped. The said person was apprehended and upon enquiry, he disclosed his name as Vinay Kumar @ Vicky. Upon checking a plastic bucket tied with the mudguard of the tractor, 7000 tablets of ‘Clovidol-10 SR’ (Tramadol Hydrochloride) were recovered.

The matter was investigated by the police and a report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was presented before the trial Court on March 4, 2021. The said report was, however, not accompanied by the report of FSL.

The period of 180 days, which is mandated for filing of challan as per provisions of NDPS Act read with Section 167 Cr.P.C. expired on June 20, 2021. Since the prosecution did not file the FSL report even by the said date, the petitioner moved an application under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. for his release on bail on June 22, 2021 on the ground that in the absence of a report of FSL, the challan could not be said to be complete.

The said application was considered by the trial Court but was dismissed on July 5, 2021.

The Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the trial Court fell in error in relying upon a Full Bench judgment rendered by the Court in AIR 1978 Punjab 341 – State of Haryana Vs. Mehal Singh and others whereas the said judgment did not pertain to an offence under the NDPS Act and has in fact been distinguished by a subsequent judgment dated November 30, 2018 of a Division Bench in Ajit Singh @ Jeeta Vs. State of Punjab.

The Counsel further submitted that since there has been some conflict in judgments of the Court as regards the issue in hand, the matter has been referred to a larger Bench order dated September 16, 2020 passed in 2020 (4) Law Herald 3188 Julfkar Vs. State of Haryana to consider as to whether a challan filed without report of FSL would be an incomplete challan.

It has been submitted that several co-ordinate Benches have granted bail in view of the fact that the matter in hand has been referred to a Division Bench and is still pending.

Opposing the petition, the State counsel submitted that since the mandate of Cr.P.C. is filing of challan within the stipulated period and since the challan had been filed within 180 days in the instant instance, no case for grant of bail is made out.

The court said that, it is no doubt correct that the Supreme Court and also a full Bench of this Court have held that a challan even if not accompanied by a report of the Chemical Examiner or of the expert cannot be said to be incomplete.

The Court held that, However, it needs to be highlighted that the said cases did not pertain to an offence under the NDPS Act. A case under the NDPS Act can only survive in case the prosecution is able to establish that the article recovered is indeed contraband and which can only be established on the basis of its chemical examination, which is normally done through FSL established by the Government.

In other words, the report of the FSL forms the foundation of the case of the prosecution and in case the same is not there the entire case of prosecution falls to the ground.

The Court further observed that in other cases say any injury or hurt or murder case under IPC, even the ocular version coupled with some medical evidence or some other circumstantial evidence may suffice to bring home the guilt of the accused.

Though a report of an expert, if sought, pertaining to some blood stains or comparison of handwriting, ballistic report, could be helpful to establish the case of the prosecution for such offences under IPC or some other Acts but cannot be said to be indispensable in each and every case and even in the absence of such reports, the prosecution may well be able to establish its case.

The petitioner contended that the report of FSL forms the foundation of the case of the prosecution and is an integral part of the challan and cannot be brushed aside.

Since there are some conflicting judgments of the Court and the matter stands referred to a Division Bench and is still subjudice, the Court deemed appropriate to extend the concession of bail in terms of Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. to the petitioner while also keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has been behind bars since the last more than 9 months and is not stated to be involved in any other case.

“The impugned order is accordingly set aside and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

It is, however, clarified that the prosecution would be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail/recall of this order in case the reference made to the larger Bench in Julfkar’s case (Supra) is answered in favour of prosecution”, the court-ordered./ILNS/AP/SNG/

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Punjab & Haryana HC: Forensic report forms the foundation of a case under the NDPS Act, and if it’s not there, the entire case...

Chandigarh, Oct 18 (ILNS) The Punjab and Haryana High Court on October 14, observed that the Forensic...

AMU founder Sir Syed’s crusade against illiteracy benefited all Indians, not just Muslims: ex-CJI TS Thakur

New Delhi, Oct 18 (ILNS) Former Chief Justice of India Justice T.S. Thakur on Sunday said...

Delhi High Court refuses to quash criminal case against man accused of touching own son, daughter inappropriately

New Delhi, Oct 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court has refused to quash the criminal case against...

SCAORA e-Lecture Series: Senior Advocate Harish Salve on basic structure, landmark cases

New Delhi, Oct 16 (ILNS) The Supreme Court Advocates On Record Association (SCAORA) on Saturday organised an Academy...

Calcutta High Court grants anticipatory bail to BJP leader Kailash Vijayvargiya, others in assault case

Kolkata, Oct 16 (ILNS) The Calcutta High Court on Thursday granted anticipatory bail till October 25 to...

Delhi court sends conman, his actor wife to ED custody till October 23

New Delhi, Oct 16, (ILNS) A Delhi court today sent conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar and his wife, South...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you