Uncategorized Plea in SC challenging MP Higher Judicial Services Rules

Plea in SC challenging MP Higher Judicial Services Rules

-

New Delhi: A plea has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Condition of Services) Rules, 2017.

The plea has been filed by an Additional District Judge from Madhya Pradesh through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey and has challenged the 100-point roster for deciding seniority of officers, prospectively under Rule 11.

According to the petitioner the Supreme Court, in its judgement in the case of All India Judges Association & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2002), had not only prescribed a 40-point cadre base roster system, but also laid down binding directions to be followed. The authorities, however, have still not incorporated the apex court’s directions.

The plea has called the delay in incorporation of the rule regarding roster, arbitrary and unjustified that has infringed the valuable rights of the petitioner as well as other persons who were appointed directly from the bar as District Judges.

The plea submitted that after coming into force of the new rule the protest petition of the petitioner which was pending since last 12 years was rejected on the ground that petitioner is claiming seniority from the date when he was not in the service. It was also mentioned that ‘Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (Recruitment and Condition of Service) Rules 2017’ came into force with effect from March 13, 2018 which provides specific provisions for roster system in determining seniority of officers appointed to Higher Judicial Service and these rules are applicable from the date of their publication in the official gazette, therefore no benefit can be given to the petitioner with regard to roster system as it could only operate prospectively.

Read Also: SC expunges all its adverse comments against lawyer, made during Aug 25 hearing

The plea states that the petitioner is aggrieved by the belated rejection of his representations by which he never claimed seniority from back date, but simply claimed seniority on the basis of roster as per direction of the Supreme Court, and the effective date of new rule is in utter violation of the direction of the apex court.

-India Legal Bureau

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Allahabad High Court asks Uttar Pradesh DGP, SIT members to clarify on police inaction in 2019 Mainpuri teen’s hanging

Allahabad Sept 15 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court today in the investigation of the case regarding the...

Delhi High Court adjourns hearing in a plea seeking direction to Centre to appoint a chairperson to PMLA Appellate Tribunal

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Delhi High Court on Tuesday has adjourned its hearing till October 7 in...

SEBI disposes of adjudication proceedings initiated against Yes Bank Limited

Mumbai Sept 15(ILNS): The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) disposed of the instant adjudication proceedings...

Supreme Court issues notice in appeal filed by Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Supreme Court today issued a notice in an appeal filed by the...

Lal Gumbad: Delhi High Court asks ASI, DDA to rid pre-Mughal monument of encroachments

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Delhi High Court, today, asked the Archaeological Survey of India and the...

Bikru encounter: Supreme Court issues notice to UP govt on bail plea of Khushi, sister-in-law of gangster Vikas Dubey

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Supreme Court today issued a notice in a bail plea filed by...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you