Breaking News Plea in SC challenges P&H HC notification designating 19...

Plea in SC challenges P&H HC notification designating 19 lawyers as Senior Advocates

-

New Delhi, Jul 3 (ILNS) A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court through Advocate Malak Manish Bhatt, challenging the May 28, 2021 notification of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, designating 19 lawyers as Senior Advocates.

In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961, the decision of the High Court was taken at a Full Court meeting.

The petitioner said that the High Court violated the mandatory and binding directions of the Supreme Court and Rules 9 to 11 of the Rules framed by the High Court, pursuant to the Indira Jaising case.

It was submitted that the final recommendations were drawn illegally and not as per the marks/ranking and relative merit.

The plea further contended that the entire result of 112 candidates was never placed before the Full Court for approval and claimed that the “Full Court wrongly and illegally voted thereon.”

Advocate Bhatt submitted that 113 applications for Senior Advocate designation were received. However, “all of a sudden on May 19, 2021, all the applicants were surprisingly called physically to the High Court premises.”

He further submitted that in the absence of any agenda, data or material of 85 candidates, there was no application of mind of the Full Court as mandated by this Court in Indira Jaising’s case.

The petition stated, “Permanent committee sat online during such interactions between May 20 to 22, 2021, (almost eight hours), barely giving even a minute’s time to each of the 112 candidates”.

According to the petition, a list of 41 candidates had been prepared. Another list was reportedly drawn and finally on May 25, 2021, a list of 27 recommended candidates was in circulation.

The plea also said that the relative merit of all candidates vis-a-vis the designees was never declared.

The petition sought the following relief:

  1. Direction to produce the complete records and that the same be placed under safe custody for the pendency of the case.
  2. Order quashing the notification dated May 28 and also setting aside list of Senior Designations
  3. Direction to strictly adhere to High Court Rules on Senior Designations
  4. Direction to Permanent Committee to adhere to Rules 9 and 10 of the High Court Rules
  5. Stay on implementation of notice designating 19 Seniors. ILNS/AP/RJ

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Supreme Court says Nagaraj judgment already decided policy for determining backwardness, no need to revisit it again

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court today said it will not going to decide again policy...

Khori Gaon: Faridabad municipal corporation assures Supreme Court of completing rehabilitation by April 30, 2022

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court today heard a plea seeking rehabilitation for the Jhuggi dwellers...

Allahabad High Court refuses to intervene in PIL seeking stay on demolition of small temples in Vindhyachal temple corridor

Allahabad Sept 14(ILNS): The Allahabad High Court on Monday, refused to intervene on a PIL seeking a...

Supreme Court says life imprisonment means rigorous imprisonment for life, dismisses SLP

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court has held that the sentence of life imprisonment has to...

Himachal Pradesh High Court upholds National Lok Adalat award on withdrawal of cross-objections against state govt

Himachal Pradesh Sept 14(ILNS): The Himachal Pradesh High Court recently, while observing that “Petition is nothing but an afterthought”, dismissed...

Bihar LJP MP Prince Raj booked for rape

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): Lok Janshakti Party (LJP) MP from Bihar's Samastipur Prince Raj has been booked...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you