Courts Update No need to show sympathy in corruption cases: SC

No need to show sympathy in corruption cases: SC


New Delhi Aug 23(ILNS): The Supreme Court, today, dismissed a plea challenging the conviction and sentence of a man under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, stating that there is no need to show sympathy in corruption cases.

A Bench comprised of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Hrishikesh Roy noted that the appellant has not even undergone half of the sentence awarded by the trial court and herein filed a plea seeking suspension of sentence. 

The Bench told the Counsel of the appellant, “Had you undergone 1/3rd of your sentence, then we would have thought about entertaining this petition.”

The plea was filed by one Surjit Singh, urging to set aside the suspension of sentence in a corruption case, wherein he demanded illegal gratification to render a favorable report for restoration of watercourses to landowner Sukhwinder Singh.

The petition challenged the Punjab and Haryana High Court order, which had dismissed his appeal, noting that the custody period alone cannot be a ground for suspension of sentence. It was argued before the High Court by the Counsel for the appellant that the prosecution had failed to prove the demand and acceptance. The appellant had already undergone custody of more than one-and-a-half years, argued the Counsel, seeking suspension of sentence. 

Surjit got convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to undergo four years of RI and a fine of Rs 10,000 under Section 7 and 4 years of R.I. under section 13(2)  of PC Act, 1988 and a fine of Rs 10,000 vide judgment dated February 13, 2020, in default of such payment, RI for one month was imposed upon the Petitioner.

The petitioner worked as Patwari in Canal Circle Matti, Canals Divisions, Mansa. A complaint was filed by Sukhwinder, alleging that he moved an application for restoration of the watercourse to his land. The accused (applicant) demanded illegal gratification to render the favorable report. The Vigilance Authorities were approached by the complainant on August 18, 2015. A trap was laid down. There was a shadow witness. Chemical was applied to currency notes. The applicant was apprehended red-handed.

The High Court had also denied the second argument of the appellant’s Counsel with regard to the sanction order. The Court noted, “The prosecution examined the complainant, as well as the shadow, witness Veterinary Inspector to prove that the applicant demanded money, after that the complainant handed over the currency notes to the applicant.” 

The High Court had held, “So far as the second argument sanctioned order is not legally proved does not enhance the case of the applicant. PW11 Lakhwinder Singh deposed to prove sanction given by the Chief Engineer of the Department being the competent authority. The Sanction order was accorded vide order dated February 15, 2017. The custody period alone cannot be a ground for suspension of sentence.” “No ground is made out for suspension of sentence,” said the Court while dismissing the appeal./ILNS/KY/KR/SNG


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi High Court issues notice to Centre, Defence Ministry on plea challenging curbs on strike by defence personnel

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought response from the Centre and...

Allahabad High Court directs shifting of monkeys to forest within three months for creating upheaval in Varanasi city

Allahabad Sept 16 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has directed to shift the monkeys who created upheaval in Varanasi city,...

Madhya Pradesh High Court disposes of PIL seeking legal action against illegal medical practitioners in Shahdol district

Bhopal Sept 16 (ILNS) The Madhya Pradesh High Court has disposed of a PIL seeking legal action...

CJI Ramana hauls up Centre over forced retirement of NCLAT chairperson

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Thursday came down heavily on...

Delhi High Court directs UIDAI, RBI, Google India Digital Services Private Ltd to respond to PIL alleging unauthorised storage of Aadhaar, banking information by...

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court asked the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), RBI...

Supreme Court refuses PILs on Covid-19 measures due to delay in their listing

New Delhi Sept 16 The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain two PILs seeking directions to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you