Uncategorized No evidence of charas addiction, Delhi HC grants bail...

No evidence of charas addiction, Delhi HC grants bail to man


New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a man who was arrested by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

Justice Vibhu Bakhru observed,

“Although the prosecution’s case is premised on the basis that the petitioner is a charas addict and that is a reason that he had engaged in the business of trafficking of drugs, there is no medical evidence on record to establish that the petitioner is a drug addict.”

“Considering the above, this Court is of the view that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the petitioner may be acquitted. Admittedly, the petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case and there is no reason to believe that he would commit a similar offence, if released. It appears to be the prosecution’s case that the petitioner had begun dealing in drugs to feed his addiction. But, as noticed earlier, there is nothing on record to establish that the petitioner is a drug addict,” noted by the Court in its order.

The Court allowed bail application on the condition of furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/ and a surety of the like amount. The Court has imposed certain other conditions mentioned below:

  • “The petitioner shall provide a contact number and ensure that he is reachable on it all times.
  • The petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the local police station where he resides on first Monday of each calendar month.
  • The petitioner shall telephonically report to the concerned IO on the first Monday of each calendar month and disclose his whereabouts.
  • The petitioner shall ensure that he is available in all proceedings before the concerned court.
  • The petitioner shall not try to contact any of the person named in his disclosure statement either directly or indirectly.”

The Court has clarified that,

“the observations made in the order are only prima facie and solely for the purposes of examining whether the petitioner ought to be released on bail. The Trial Court shall consider the complaint and evaluate the evidence uninfluenced by any observations or findings in the order.”

Read Also: Accounts which were non-NPAs as of Aug 31, will not attract NPA till further orders: SC

The Courts decision came on an appeal filed by a man who was arrested for his involvement in the drug trafficking case. The petitioner ‘Jay Haresh Somaiya’ allegedly used to traffic drugs from Himachal Pradesh to other parts of the country through other persons who were involved in the case. It was the prosecution’s case that they arrested three persons from the Nizamuddin Railway Station in possession of the 6.2 kg of Charas which was linked to the petitioner. 

Read the order here;


-India Legal Bureau


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi HC expresses displeasure over prolonged sealing of Nizamuddin Markaz as center cites trans-border implication for opening it

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Ministry of Home Affairs, on Monday, filed an affidavit before the Delhi...

Delhi HC adjourns Mehbooba Mufti PMLA hearing to Sept 30, Centre to seek transfer of case to SC

New Delhi Sept 14 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today adjourned its hearing in the plea of...

Supreme Court says Nagaraj judgment already decided policy for determining backwardness, no need to revisit it again

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court today said it is not going to decide again policy,...

Khori Gaon: Faridabad municipal corporation assures Supreme Court of completing rehabilitation by April 30, 2022

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court today heard a plea seeking rehabilitation for the Jhuggi dwellers...

Allahabad High Court refuses to intervene in PIL seeking stay on demolition of small temples in Vindhyachal temple corridor

Allahabad Sept 14(ILNS): The Allahabad High Court on Monday, refused to intervene on a PIL seeking a...

Supreme Court says life imprisonment means rigorous imprisonment for life, dismisses SLP

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court has held that the sentence of life imprisonment has to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you