Breaking News No coercive action against NDTV promoters Prannoy Roy, Radhika...

No coercive action against NDTV promoters Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy for insider trading: Supreme Court to SEBI


New Delhi Aug 27(ILNS): The Supreme Court, today, asked SEBI not to take coercive steps against promoters of NDTV, Prannoy & Radhika Roy, who are under the scanner for insider trading.

The Bench comprised of Chief Justice NV Ramana took up the plea. Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta appeared and informed Court that it was consented to, by NDTV that the same be taken up next week, Friday. Court then said that in that case, coercive steps may not be taken against the Roys.

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi also urged for the same.

The court will hear the plea next Friday now.

The promoters of NDTV had appeal by the promoters, against an interim order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal on January 4, 2021, directing NDTV to deposit 50 percent of the fine imposed earlier by the Securities and Exchange Board of India.

Earlier, The Supreme Court stayed the recovery of the penalty of Rs 27 crore imposed by the SEBI on NDTV promoters Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy as well as their holding company RRPR Holding Pvt Ltd, for allegedly violating various securities norms by concealing information from shareholders regarding certain loan agreements.

The bench comprised of Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice M.R. Shah also directed the appellants to cooperate in the expeditious disposal of the appeals against the SEBI order by the SAT, which are listed for final disposal on April 6. On February 15, the SAT had directed that if the appellant deposits 50 percent of the amount minus interest within four weeks, the balance amount shall not be recovered during the pendency of the appeal. It was this order of December 24, 2020, which had been challenged in the top court.

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the appellants, said, “The running of a TV channel is a very difficult proposition. A lot of money is needed, and the revenue is not good. That is why so many TV channels have been boarded up. It is only Times of India and the other big channels which are functioning because they have a big network.

“NDTV is run by a husband and wife- Prannoy and Radhika Roy. They had taken a loan from the ICICI Bank in 2008 of Rs 375 crore. It was repaid by another entity, VCPL, from which another loan was taken in 2009. They took over the loan and the loan to them is still continuing, on which no interest is payable. Because no interest is payable, they think it to be a sham for the transfer of control of NDTV to the VCPL and have penalized me. I have not transferred my shares or my wife’s shares or those of my holding company to VCPL!

“They said it is a sham transaction and that I have transferred control! How can I transfer control without any transfer of shares? I have all the shares! They asked why have you taken a loan from a private entity to repay ICICI Bank? There seems to be some prejudice because of this! It was impossible for us to service the ICICI Bank loan! Who have I cheated? Why is there a penalty of Rs 25 crore and an individual penalty of Rs 1-1 crore? This amounts to closing down the channel! We have no money!”

“So the allegation is only of taking over of an outstanding loan?” asked Justice Chandrachud.

“It is not an allegation… There is a 100-page decision of SEBI. Every time, the argument is that it is NDTV, Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy. They are not a separate class, who deserves separate treatment. The violations are of a very serious nature. They are saying that they have not transferred the shares! Their shares are worthless! There is a reasoned and speaking judgment! There is a direction by a statutory regulatory body that the penalty has to be paid!

The Tribunal says that it is not a pre-deposit, but one cannot challenge a money decree without some deposit. This is that ‘some deposit’…This has been a practice in the tribunal!

I would be guilty of not opposing the present appellants when I have opposed others!,” argued Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.

On February 15, 2021, the SAT had directed the NDTV promoters to deposit 50% of the disgorged amount before SEBI. The Tribunal also mentioned that if the Roys deposit 50% of the amount minus interest within four weeks, the balance amount should not be recovered during the pendency of the appeal.

SEBI has imposed a fine of Rs 25 crore on the Roys and RRPR Holding, which needed to be paid jointly and severally for allegedly violating various securities norms by concealing information from shareholders regarding certain loan agreements. Besides, a penalty of Rs 1 crore each was levied on Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy.

The market regulator had imposed this penalty in view of an alleged violation of various securities norms, where information was concealed from shareholders in connection with certain loan agreements. The SAT had also noted that if NDTV were to deposit the amount, the balance would not be recovered during the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal.

On January 28, 2021, the NDTV promoters had informed the Supreme Court that the news channel is facing financial hardship due to limited resources. The submissions were made during the hearing of their appeal challenging the SAT order directing the Roys to deposit 50% of the alleged unlawful gains, which market regulator SEBI said they made.

Last month, the apex court had asked SAT to hear the appeal of NDTV and the Roys against the orders of SEBI in other matters without the pre-condition of depositing 50% of the fine of Rs16.97 crore.

As observed by the SAT in its June 2019 order, RRPR Holding took a loan of Rs 350 crore from ICICI Bank Ltd, at an interest rate of 19% per annum. This loan was required to be repaid within a stipulated period. Finding it difficult to repay the interest and principal amount RRPR Holding then took two loans from Vishva Pradhan Commercial Pvt Ltd (VCPL) totaling about Rs 400 crore in July 2009 and January 2010.

RRPR Holding held shares of NDTV which is a listed company.

SAT says, “Based on the loan taken from VCPL, it was alleged that the loan of ICICI Bank was liquidated. While taking a loan from VCPL certain agreements were entered, namely, that VCPL will give an interest-free loan for a period of 10 years on the condition that the principal amount would be paid within 10 years and that the VCPL will have a right of first refusal on 50% of the shares in the event the said shares are sold in the market. Further, a call option agreement was made whereby an option was given to two associates of VCPL for the transfer of 30% of the shareholding of RRPR Holdings to it at the price of Rs 214.65 per share. It was stated that at the time the loan agreement was executed, the price of the NDTV share was Rs 130 per share. It was also stated that the price of Rs 214.65 per share was fixed in order to cover the loan amount of Rs 403.85 crore. The agreement further stipulated that RRPR Holding would have the sole control and will not sell the shares without the right of the first refusal by the lender, namely, VCPL.”

“After considering the loan agreement in detail, SEBI in its findings stated that the said loan agreement was nothing else but a sham agreement and that no prudent person or entity would enter into such an agreement giving a loan without any interest. In fact, SEBI further found that the transfer of money was to control the listed company NDTV. SEBI further found that the transfer of 9% individual shares of Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy to its holding company, namely, RRPR Holding amounted to non-disclosure of transfer of shares inviting violations of disclosure obligations,” the SAT order noted./ILNS/AV/SNG


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Allahabad High Court asks Uttar Pradesh DGP, SIT members to clarify on police inaction in 2019 Mainpuri teen’s hanging

Allahabad Sept 15 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court today in the investigation of the case regarding the...

Delhi High Court adjourns hearing in a plea seeking direction to Centre to appoint a chairperson to PMLA Appellate Tribunal

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Delhi High Court on Tuesday has adjourned its hearing till October 7 in...

SEBI disposes of adjudication proceedings initiated against Yes Bank Limited

Mumbai Sept 15(ILNS): The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) disposed of the instant adjudication proceedings...

Supreme Court issues notice in appeal filed by Orissa Administrative Tribunal Bar Association

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Supreme Court today issued a notice in an appeal filed by the...

Lal Gumbad: Delhi High Court asks ASI, DDA to rid pre-Mughal monument of encroachments

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Delhi High Court, today, asked the Archaeological Survey of India and the...

Bikru encounter: Supreme Court issues notice to UP govt on bail plea of Khushi, sister-in-law of gangster Vikas Dubey

New Delhi Sept 15(ILNS): The Supreme Court today issued a notice in a bail plea filed by...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you