Madhya Pradesh Aug 31(ILNS): The Madhya Pradesh High Court has disposed of a PIL, questioning the mining activities of some private respondents in Jabalpur city.
The Jabalpur Division Bench comprised of Chief Justice Mohammad Rafiq and Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla heard the PIL on August 24, filed by one Atmaram Awadhiya in 2010, calling in question the mining activities of the Private Respondents, stating that due to mining activities of the respondents, the living standard and condition of local residents of the town has deteriorated and they are suffering badly.
The private respondents have filed their reply and submitted that they are carrying out mining operations after taking permission from the competent authority – the Director of Mines Safety, Jabalpur Region, Jabalpur.
It is submitted that as per the order dated March 22, 2006, the respondents are carrying all mining activities between 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and no blasting work has ever been done between 10:00 p.m. to 06:00 a.m.
It is further submitted that long back, when the trial blasting was done, the local residents have attended the place and were satisfied that there is no vibration, either in their doors or windows. They have also filed the Certificate of recording of the blast-induced vibration carried between November 30, 2005, to December 1, 2005, in the presence of representatives of the Trade Union, Safety Committee Members, and local residents of the area.
The respondents have further submitted that from time to time investigation is conducted to measure the ground vibration by the Experts of Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Ltd.
The Court observed that as per the report dated January 9, 2010, it is clear that the Seismograph Monitoring of vibration was conducted at Pali Bazar in the presence of local residents and there is no non-permissible peak particle velocity at the foundation level of structures in mining areas and the vibration levels recorded is insufficient to cause any effect or damage to the structures at surface.
It is also argued by the respondents that from time to time they provide installation facilities of Hand Pumps in Pali Township for drinking water. The mine water is being discharged into the Ganjra Nala to raise the water level of that area. The water level of Pali Township is at about 40 meters, whereas, the working depth of the mine is 150 meters.
“This fact clearly establishes that the mining activities have nothing to do with the normal water level. Further, there is no shortage of water due to mining activities in the area. The mining activities have been carried out for the last 70 years and there is no complaint ever made by anyone,” the Court further observed.
In the reply filed by the Private Respondent, it has been submitted that they are following the rules and regulations, while extracting coal.
The Bench noted that there is no rejoinder to contradict the submissions made by the Private Respondent. The petition was filed in 2010 and the reply was filed by the Private Respondent on July 1, 2010. Thereafter, no rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner.
“We do not deem it proper to keep the present PIL pending further and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take legal recourse before the competent authority, in case any grievance still survives. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of,” the order read./ILNS/SS/SNG