Breaking News Lakhimpur Kheri: Supreme Court to appoint Ex HC Judge...

Lakhimpur Kheri: Supreme Court to appoint Ex HC Judge to oversee investigation till Chargesheet is filed

-

New Delhi, Nov 8 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today expressed its displeasure in the way the Investigation in the Lakhimpur Kheri Incident is proceeding and said it wants the investigation should be overseen by a Retired judge so as to bring “independence” and “fairness” in the case.

Justice Surya Kant said, that it appears to us that Special Investigation Team (SIT) is unable to maintain a balance in the recording of evidence in the FIRs. To ensure that the evidence recorded in FIR 219 independently and recorded in FIR 220 independently and should not overlap. We are going to appoint a retired judge from another State.

A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice N V Ramana, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Hima Kohli was hearing the PIL (writ petition criminal) seeking a judicial probe into the Lakhimpur Kheri incident which has led to the death of eight people including farmers and a journalist. 

The Top Court said it is not confident about the manner in which the evidence is being recorded by the Uttar Pradesh Special Investigation Team (SIT) and said it wishes to appoint former Punjab and Haryana HC Judge Ranjit Singh to oversee the manner in which witnesses’ statements are being recorded and avoid mixing of the cases.

Only Ashish Mishra’s phone is seized: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court pointed out that only the phone of one accused Ashish Mishra has been sized by the Police. What about the other accused? It asked. 

Senior Advocate Harish Salve said there are 8 mobile phones which have been taken away from accused

CJI asked did they use the mobile phone? 

Salve replied that some of the accused said that they don’t have cellphones but CDRs have been obtained

Justice Hima Kohli said, is it your statement that none of the other accused had cellphones on them? Where in the status report you have said that? Are you saying that they have not used the cell phone? 

Salve replied there is a clinching proof that they were on the spot. The presence of the vehicle is established.

Justice Surya Kant said, prima facie it appears that one particular accused is seeking to be given benefit by overlapping two FIRs, you can appreciate very well the fate of the case.

Salve replied during the investigation 68 statements have been recorded.

Justice Surya Kant said you have to refer to statements of 68 witnesses. We are not aware of what they have deposed under 164, it is not necessary for us to know this. Some of them were giving evidence about crime but somebody gave statements about the other FIR. The police realise that there were other people in the crowd who are trying to protect one accused. 

CJI NV Ramana said that is why it has to be separately investigated. 

Salve said it is being done so. it is not that FIR 219 is not being probed and only FIR 220 is being probed. The FIR 220 is about public lynching so collecting evidence is a little difficult in that. 

Justice Kant said one case of murder is of the farmers, one case is of journalists and one is of political workers. In the case of political workers, the accused themselves have died. “We are concerned about the murder of farmers, a journalist and political workers. There are 58 witnesses deposing in favour of the accused persons. Who are the persons involved In the killing of these farmers?” asked Justice Kant. 

Salve said when they come to give statements we have to record, we cannot say we won’t record statements. There were 16 accused and 3 died in the incident and 13 were arrested. 

Where are the CDR records in your status report: Supreme Court 

Justice Hima Kohli pointed out and asked where have you said that out of 13 only one mobile from one accused has been seized and all other mobiles were thrown off or not seized? where have you said CDR has been recorded, in your status report? 

Salve said, maybe the CDR is not mentioned in the report. I will check with them and make sure CDR should be mentioned. I am assuring milord that CDR is there. 

Prima facie it appears you are protecting the accused: Supreme Court 

Justice Kant said what we expect from SIT is those coming to depose in the case of farmers death, this will be an independent exercise and the evidence you are collecting in the other case cannot be used in this. “We are going to appoint a judge to monitor and oversee the investigation till the Chargesheet has been filed,” said Justice Kant. 

Salve said there is a mixing of Fir no 219 and 220 only in the case of a killing of a journalist. 

CJI replied this is why we are saying there should be an independent judge who shall monitor all the investigations. 

Justice Surya Kant said it is because of the death of this journalist who was beaten to death.

Salve said these farmers and journalist was killed by the vehicles. 

Justice Surya Kant said this is why we are saying there is another story. There should be an independent judge. 

Salve replied I will take instructions, Milord.

CBI not the solution to everything: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court said no to CBI probe into the incident saying CBI is not the solution to everything. “We want a retired High Court Judge to monitor the probe and filing of separate charge sheets. We want to protect the evidence collected,” said the bench. 

The Supreme Court has listed the matter for Friday allowing senior advocate Harish Salve to take instructions with regard to the appointment of a former judge to oversee the investigation in the Lakhimpur Kheri incident.

The Court had previously directed the Uttar Pradesh government to provide security to witnesses and gather more information on the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case where a jeep allegedly driven by the son of a BJP leader ran over four farmers on October 3.

The bench had also sought a status report on the probe into the killing of one Shyam Sundar, who was an occupant of one of the vehicles involved in the incident and Kashyap, allegedly killed in the violence that followed the vehicle hit.

The Supreme Court had taken suo motu congnizance of the incident on October 7, 2021. Later the court directed the Registry to convert it into a Public Interest Litigation (Writ Petition Criminal)./ILNS/KR/SNG/

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Lakhimpur Kheri: Supreme Court to appoint Ex HC Judge to oversee investigation till Chargesheet is filed

New Delhi, Nov 8 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today expressed its displeasure in the way the Investigation...

Allahabad High Court grants bail to youth for molesting, threatening a minor girl, forcing her to commit suicide

Allahabad, Nov 8 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court on November 01, granted conditional bail to Amar Singh...

Auctioning of milching cows with calves does not amount to cruelty: Orissa High Court

Bhubaneshwar, Nov 6 (ILNS) The Orissa High Court dismissed a plea filed by Dhyaan Foundation, a registered...

Tripura Police book Delhi lawyer under UAPA provisions for sharing fake info on social media

Agartala, Nov 5 (ILNS) The Tripura Police booked a Delhi-based lawyer under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act...

Former president DHCBA, Rajiv Khosla convicted after 27 years, for assaulting lady lawyer, for not participating in an event

New Delhi, Nov 5 (ILNS) A Delhi court convicted Rajiv Khosla, a former president of the Delhi...

Initial date of appointment better barometer to decide seniority, says Supreme Court in MES case

New Delhi, Nov 5 (ILNS) The Supreme Court recently held that if anyone is aggrieved with his...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you