Courts Update Karnataka HC to govt: Ensure witnesses protection in criminal...

Karnataka HC to govt: Ensure witnesses protection in criminal cases against MPs, MPAs, MLCs

-

Karnatka(ILNS)The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday directed the state government to instruct all investigating officers probing criminal cases against MPs, MLAs, and MLCs to take measures to ensure the protection of witnesses as per the witness protection scheme.

The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 has been approved by the Supreme Court in its landmark judgement of Mahendra Chawla v. Union of India, making it the first attempt to bring the protection of witness under the ambit of law and putting the responsibility on the State to implement it effectively.

A division bench headed by Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Vishwajith Shetty, which took up a suo motu PIL on expediting pending criminal cases against lawmakers, pointed out,” Supreme Court has directed that keeping in mind vulnerability of witnesses, trial courts may consider granting protection to witnesses without making any application.”

The bench said investigating officers should also assess the vulnerability/threat perception of witnesses and file applications on their behalf and bring the matter to the notice of the special court. Even the special court should apply its mind on the requirement of protection and issue the necessary direction to the State Government.

The authority for Bengaluru Urban District has to be constituted in two weeks. The Government must set up a witness protection fund for ensuring effective implementation of the scheme. Also, the proposal for establishing the second Special Court must be approved at the earliest.

The bench noted the Special Court is part of the city Civil Court and therefore, the principal city civil and sessions judge will be chairman of the competent authority. Every investigating officer should be informed that it’s his/her duty to assess whether a prosecution witness can become vulnerable due to various aspects and if there’s a threat perception.

“We hope and trust that the final decision on the second Special Court as per request made by the high Court on the administrative side is taken by the state government.” the bench said.

Apart from 36 cases in which the state of Karnataka is the prosecuting agency, there are 136 cases in which agencies like the CBI, SFIO and Lokayukta are the prosecuting agencies, Senior Advocate Aditya Sondhi appearing as amicus curiae in the matter informed the Court. The Court has now posted the matter for further hearing on December 18.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Rotary and Tata Trusts to collaborate in Cancer care, Covid care, Nutrition, Rural Uplift Livelihoods, to supplement efforts towards strengthening the nation

New Delhi, July 14 (ILNS) The Tata Trusts and Rotary today announced a five-year collaboration to scale...

Bar Council of Delhi distributed more than Rs 19 crore to lawyers during lockdown: BCD Chairman Ramesh Gupta

New Delhi, Jul 14 (ILNS) The Bar Council of Delhi is reaching out to the lawyers, who...

NGT flays Haryana over sewage overflow on National Highway-19

New Delhi, Jul 14 (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal has pulled up the state of Haryana over...

SC issues notice to UP govt for going ahead with Kanwar Yatra, amid COVID-19 pandemic

New Delhi, Jul 14 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today took suo motu cognisance and issued notice to the Uttar...

Government decision is unconstitutional, SC strikes down Tribunal Reforms Ordinance,2021

New Delhi, Jul 14 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today struck down the provisions of the Tribunal Reforms...

AP knocks SC doors over illegal use of water from inter-state irrigation projects

New Delhi, Jul 14 (ILNS) The state of Andhra Pradesh has filed a petition before the Supreme Court to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you