Courts Update How a vigilant tweet by the resident of society...

How a vigilant tweet by the resident of society about the breach of the COVID-19 protocol by Maids constitute a violation of prohibitory orders. Allahabad HC reprimands police, quashes FIR

-

Allahabad Jul, 23 (ILNS): The Allahabad High Court recently quashed criminal proceedings against a man who had tweeted that maids were entering his society without sanitizing their hands, etc while noting that a vigilant tweet by the resident of society about the breach of the Covid-19 protocol can’t constitute a violation of prohibitory orders passed under Section 144 of CrPC.

A Single Bench of Justice J. J Munir passed this order while hearing an application u/s 482 filed by Tarun Jain.

The petition sought to quash proceedings of Case under Sections 182, 188, and 271 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, pending before the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar.

The application was initially heard on September 21, 2020, and an interim stay of further proceedings before the Magistrate was granted. Later on, the application came up on January 19, 2021, when, by a detailed order, it was admitted to hearing and notice was issued not only to the State but also the second opposite party, requiring both these opposite parties to file a counter-affidavit. The time-bound interim order granted on September 21, 2020, was directed to remain in operation until further orders.

The complainant-respondents, who is a Sub-Inspector of Police, and to whom notice was directed to issue, has not been served, with the Office not putting in a report either way. It is a little hard to believe that a Sub-Inspector of Police would not be served through the criminal process that is routed through the Police. In any case, the presence of the second opposite party is not much required in his case, instituted on a Police Report, where the State is before us.

The case against the applicant is that the second opposite party lodged a First Information Report with Police Station – Sector 49, NOIDA, District, Gautam Buddh Nagar to the effect that the informant, who is a Sub-Inspector and was on duty on March 25, 2020. A tweet by the applicant came to his notice, which said that maidservants and courier boys were entering the society, where the applicant resides, without sanitizing themselves and the maintenance staff has not provided for sanitizers to enable them to do so.

The FIR further went on to say that orders under Section 144 of the Code had been promulgated in the district, looking to the Corona Virus (CoViD-19) pandemic, and the applicant, by his tweet aforesaid, had spread a rumor, violating the prohibitory order. On this short information, an FIR was registered against the applicant, giving rise to Case under Sections 182, 188, and 271 of the Penal Code, Police Station – Sector 49, NOIDA, District Gautam Buddh Nagar. The police, after investigation, has submitted the charge-sheet dated June 02, 2020, saying that offenses punishable under Sections 182, 188, and 271 of the Penal Code are disclosed against the applicant from the investigation made, the statement of the complainant, statement of the witnesses, statement of the accused and on an inspection of the place of occurrence. The Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offense, by means of an order dated July 07, 2020, and issued summons to the applicant to stand his trial for the offenses alleged.

It was argued by Counsel for the applicant that though a notice under Section 41A of the Code was issued to the applicant, asking him to attend the police station on March 25, 2020, but when he went there, the Police did not record his statement or ask him any questions; rather they released him on furnishing a personal bond.

It was also argued that no prima facie case is made out against the applicant, inasmuch as his act in saying that maidservants were entering the society without sanitizing their hands etc. and that there was no provision made by the society’s maintenance staff for the ready availability of sanitizers, the intention of the applicant ex-facie was to secure the health of residents of Plot No. 7, Golf City, Sector 75, NOIDA, the society where the applicant resides in Flat No. 604, Tower A3. The purpose of the tweet was not to create an alarm at large in the town or the district but to caution the other residents of the society against the impending risk that he had observed.

The Court has perused the statements recorded by the Police under Section 161 of the Code, which say no more than this, that the applicant’s tweet was found to be incorrect for a fact, on a visit made to the premises of the society, where sanitizers were available and those entering the society were being required to sanitize.

The Court noted that there is an added stand in the almost cyclo-styled statements of various witnesses, all policemen, that the aforesaid tweet, carrying incorrect information, amounts to spreading a rumor that violates prohibitory orders promulgated in the district under Section 144 of the Code.

Ex-facie, the Court failed to understand how a vigilant tweet by the resident of society about the breach of the CoViD-19 protocol in relation to outsiders entering the premises could constitute a violation of prohibitory orders.

The Court held that the investigation was a serious exercise if the Police had recorded statements of some residents of the society, and those in charge of the maintenance there, or the security guards at the entrance gates. Whatever of the Case Diary has been annexed by the applicant shows statements of the first informant and other policemen recorded, carrying a parroted version of facts that ex-facie do not inspire any confidence.

Here, the applicant never gave any information to the Police or any public servant. What the applicant did was a tweet that was perhaps a matter of concern for other residents of the society, rather than a busy body like the Sub-Inspector, who lodged a FIR in the case”, the Court observed.

The Court found that the prosecution not only fails to disclose a cognizable case against the applicant but is one that is a reckless abuse of the process of the Court. The Commissioner of Police, Gautam Buddh Nagar ought to bear caution and ensure that frivolous prosecutions, like the one in question, are not launched against respectable citizens. It is the duty of the Court under Section 482 of the Code to prevent abuse of process of Court. The Court would expect that the Trial Court would also not permit frivolous cases to survive, burdening its already overloaded docket on one hand, and on the other, resulting in utterly uncalled for harassment of a respectable citizen. Cases of this kind ought to be scuttled, whenever and wherever it comes to the notice of a competent court, whether it be at the stage of discharge or in a criminal revision or through an application, asking the proceedings to be quashed.

“In the considered opinion of the Court, the above proceedings cannot be permitted to continue and deserve to be quashed.

As the result, the application succeeds and stands allowed. The proceedings of Case under Sections 182, 188, and 271 of the Penal Code, Police Station – Sector 49, NOIDA, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar are hereby quashed.

Let an entry be made in the General Diary of Police Station – Sector 49, NOIDA, District – Gautam Buddh Nagar to the effect that proceedings of Case under Sections 182, 188, and 271 of the Penal Code stand quashed under orders of the Court. The aforesaid part of the order shall be caused to be carried out in the records of the police station concerned by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar within a week of receipt of a copy of the order”, the Court ordered./ILNS/SNG

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Supreme Court issues notice in plea challenging reservation for OBC, EWS within All India Quota for post-graduate medical courses

New Delhi Sept 17(ILNS): The Supreme Court today issued a notice in a plea challenging 27% a plea...

Madhya Pradesh HC dismisses PIL on the location of the school

Madhya Pradesh Sept 17(ILNS): The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently, while observing that those matters are best...

Supreme Court Collegium recommends elevation of 8 judges as chief justices of high courts, transfers of chief justices also on the cards

New Delhi Sept 17(ILNS): The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the elevation of 8 judges as chief...

Supreme Court issues notice on tennis player’s appeal on being denied a job under sports quota

New Delhi Sept 17(ILNS): The Supreme Court on Thursday has issued notice to the Jharkhand Public Service...

Delhi High Court asks Delhi Govt to reconsider not allowing the sale, service of herbal hookah

New Delhi Sept 17(ILNS): The Delhi High Court today in a batch of petitions filed by various...

“Dalit Girl” was brutally raped by a priest: Police to Delhi HC

New Delhi Sept 17 (ILNS) The Delhi Police has told the Delhi Court that a nine-year-old girl who was allegedly raped and murdered by a priest and...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you