Breaking News Future Retail-Reliance deal: Delhi HC stays order, issues notice...

Future Retail-Reliance deal: Delhi HC stays order, issues notice to Amazon

-

New Delhi, Mar 22 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today stayed the Single Bench order, by which Justice JR Midha had upheld the order of the Emergency Arbitrator of Singapore, restraining the Future Retail Limited from going ahead with its Rs 24,713 crore deal with Reliance Retail to sell its business.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Jasmeet Singh, while staying the March 18 order, which had also imposed a cost of Rs 20 lakh on Future Group’s Kishore Biyani and other respondents, also issued notice to US-based e-commerce giant Amazon. The bench slated the matter for further hearing on April 30.

During the course of arguments, Senior Advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the Future Group, read the directions passed by the Single Bench and said, “I am seeking a stay on all these directions. The matter is also pending before the Supreme Court. We either argue here or there (SC)”.

Gopal Subramanium, appearing for Amazon, argued that there was an Interim order in the SLP before SC. “We can’t surely argue at both the places. SLP was challenging the ad interim order,” said Mr Subramanium, adding that it would be appropriate that an application is filed before the SC and directions are sought thereof.

Mr Salve opposed the said submissions and said, “The appeal of the single bench order lies before this very court. My remedy lies in the appeal. Further directions have been passed by the Single Bench which have to be stayed. I don’t want the Supreme Court to be told that despite the matter being pending, this Court went into it”.

To this the court said, “Mr Subramanium, they (Future) are saying that the single judge order be stayed during the pendency of the appeal.”

Following these arguments, the bench ordered, “Having heard the counsels and looking at the facts and circumstances of the case…the single bench order is stayed. The stay will remain in operation till the next date of hearing…Notice issued on the appeal and the same is made returnable on April 30.”

Future Group on March 20 moved the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (HC) against the order passed by a single-member Bench, which directed to stay its Rs 24,713-crore deal with Reliance Industries, to sell the firm’s retail and wholesale business.

The Kishore Biyani-led group firm, Future Retail (FRL), filed an appeal before the higher Bench of the same HC against the orders passed by a single-member Bench of Justice J R Midha, which restrained Future Retail from going ahead with the deal, Future Retail said in a regulatory filing.

Earlier on March 18, the Delhi High Court had upheld the Emergency Award passed against the 34-billion dollar Future-Reliance deal.

The court also imposed a penalty of Rs 20 lakh on Future and the money will go to the Prime Minister’s Relief Fund.

Justice JR Midha said, “Showcause notice to Respondent no 2-13 (Kishore Biyani, Future Retail, Future Coupons and others), explaining as to why they should not be detained in civil prison for violating the order of the emergency arbitrator for three months.”

The single bench order was passed on the petition filed by Amazon, seeking the enforcement of the Emergency Award and restraining the Future Group from going ahead with its deal with Reliance, stating the order passed by the Emergency Arbitrator “shall be deemed to be an order of the Court for all purposes and shall be enforceable under the Code of Civil Procedure”.

The bench further directed to attach all properties of all the respondents, while the FRL shall not take any action and all the Respondents shall file a status report at least three days before the next date of hearing.

Justice Midha had noted, “This Court is of the prima facie view that the Emergency Arbitrator is an Arbitrator; the Emergency Arbitrator has rightly proceeded against the respondent No 2 (Future Group).”

On the last date of hearing, Senior Advocate Gopal Subramanium, appearing for Amazon, had submitted, “The respondents have deliberately and willfully violated and are continuing further with the violation of the order dated October 25, 2020 of the ‘Emergency Arbitrator’ and immediate interim order be passed to protect the petitioner’s rights till the pronouncement of the reserved order”.

It further contended that any delay in the protection order would cause irreparable loss to Amazon. The bench had also asked Biyani and others to appear before the Court on the next date of hearing, while listing the matter for further hearing on April 28.

Jeff-Bezos-led Amazon is locked in legal disputes with Biyani-headed Future. It has alleged that the retail conglomerate violated an agreement with the American e-commerce firm by agreeing to sell its assets to Mukesh Ambani-owned Reliance Industries last year. ILNS/ANB/SNG/RJ

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

NGT directs DJB to pay Rs Five Lakh per month to CPCB till they control bad odour from Sewage Treatment Plant

New Delhi, Jul 13 (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal today directed the Delhi Jal Board to pay...

AAP MLA Raghav Chadha says Haryana Govt stalling rightful portion of water for Delhi

New Delhi, Jul 12 (ILNS) AAP Spokesperson Raghav Chadha today said, The Delhi government has approach Supreme...

Delhi HC seeks response from Delhi Govt on New Excise Policy for Retail Liquor Vendors

New Delhi, Jul 12, (ILNS)The Delhi High Court today sought the response from...

Supreme Court adjourns plea challenging validity of sedition law to July 27

New Delhi, Jul 12 (ILNS) The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned its hearing to July 27 in...

MP High Court quashes PIL questioning delay in construction of boundary wall of Shriram Janki Temple in Gwalior

Gwalior, Jul 12 (ILNS) The Madhya Pradesh High Court on July 8 disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL)...

Supreme Court admits Bihar appeal against acquittal of 1999 Senari massacre accused

New Delhi, Jul 12 (ILNS) The Supreme Court today admitted an appeal filed by the Bihar government, challenging the...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you