Courts Update DYFI worker cut into pieces, SC declines to interfere...

DYFI worker cut into pieces, SC declines to interfere with Kerala HC verdict


New Delhi, May 27 (ILNS) The Supreme Court has dismissed the petition challenging the concurrent conviction held by two courts in a murder attempt, observing that a worker of the Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI), youth wing of Communist Party of India, was cut into pieces by sword.

The Bench of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Aniruddha Bose, on May 25, while deciding not to interfere with the Judgement of the Kerala High Court, also flayed the High Court for curbing the sentence of the accused from six to three years.

The petition was filed by accused Sadasivan, Madhu, Mohanan and Suresh, who were convicted under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 452, 427 and 307 of IPC.

Senior Advocate R Basant appeared on behalf of all four petitioners and submitted that Section 149 of IPC against the accused does not meet out and these persons have falsely been implicated. They were not carrying armed weapons, and injured the witnesses have not been examined yet, said Mr Basant.

The Court stated that after three findings of court, “If we have to examine like Trial Court, it would become difficult for us to do.”

According to the prosecution, 17 persons, allegedly having connection with RSS, had attacked a DYFI worker, with sword, iron rods, sticks and hand bombs, injuring him severely. All 17 were charged under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 452, 427, 324, 307 and 436 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act.

The Kerala High Court had observed, “Determination of common object of an unlawful assembly is essentially a question of fact keeping in view the nature of the assembly, arms carried by the members and the behaviour of the members at or near the scene and a host of similar or connected facts.

“It is trite law that the substantial evidence is the identification of accused in court. It is true that no test identification parade was conducted in this case. Under such circumstances, test identification parade is not compulsory.

“In Masalti vs State of UP [1965 KHC 476], the Apex Court held that where a crowd of assailants who are members of an unlawful assembly proceeds to commit an offence in
pursuance of the common object of the unlawful assembly, it is often not possible for
witnesses to explain the part played by each one of the assailants,” the High Court
had noted. It had reduced the sentence of the accused under Section 307 IPC from six to three years. ILNS/KY/RJ


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

In the age of social media, desecration of the reputation of a public figure has become child’s play. Delhi HC directs Saket Gokhale to...

New Delhi, July 13 (ILNS): The Delhi High Court today directed journalist Saket Gokhale to take down...

PIL in SC seeks stringent rules for rash drivers

New Delhi, Jul 13 (ILNS)A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court, seeking directions...

Can’t drink muddy and contaminated water, even if it is free, says plea in Delhi HC.

New Delhi, Jul 13 (ILNS)The Delhi High Court today asked the Delhi Government to treat the plea...

Sikkim HC directs state govt to strengthen infrastructure for third wave of Pandemic

Sikkim, Jul 13 (ILNS)The Sikkim High Court while hearing its Suo Moto Public Interest Litigation recently, for...

NGT directs DJB to pay Rs Five Lakh per month to CPCB till they control bad odour from Sewage Treatment Plant

New Delhi, Jul 13 (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal today directed the Delhi Jal Board to pay...

Delhi HC directs journalist Saket Gokhale and Twitter to remove defamatory tweets against former Indian diplomat Lakshmi Puri

New Delhi, July 13 (ILNS): The Delhi High Court today directed journalist Saket Gokhale to take down...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you