Courts Update Delhi High Court rejects plea challenging demand letters of...

Delhi High Court rejects plea challenging demand letters of East Central Railway related to licensing fee over lack of territorial jurisdiction

-

New Delhi Sept 11(ILNS): The Delhi High Court, on Friday, refused to entertain a petition challenging the demand letters issued by the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager of East Central Railway based in Uttar Pradesh asking for enhanced advance annual license fee, over lack of territorial jurisdiction.

The Bench comprised of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva, while dismissing the petition, held: “As, neither the authority i.e. the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager has its seat in Delhi, nor any action has been taken by the authority within the territory in respect of which this court exercises jurisdiction, this Court would not have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present petition.”

Relying on the decision of the Delhi High Court in “Jayswal Neco Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.”, Advocate V.K Shukla, representing the petitioner, contended that the jurisdiction vests with Delhi High Court inasmuch as the Railway Board is situated in Delhi, and the demand raised by the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager is contrary to the directions issued by the Railway Board. 

Noting that reliance on the above-named decision is misplaced, the Bench was of the view that since the seat of the authority whose action is impugned is outside the territorial limit of Delhi, the cause of action would accrue outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court.

Furthermore, the petitioner is not aggrieved by any action or inaction on part of the Railway Board. The Bench was not satisfied with the contention that the demand is contrary to the directions of the Railway Board, as it is not the direction of the Railway Board, but the demand raised by the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager that would give rise to a cause of action.

The Bench observed thus: “Under Article 226 (1) of the Constitution, the High Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ to any person or authority which has its seat within the territory in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction. Under Article 226 (2), the High Court has the power to issue a writ to an authority, which though does not have its seat within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court, but in respect of which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court.”/ILNS/BG/KR/SNG

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi HC declines 69-year disabled women’s plea seeking ED, EOW and other probe, for loss of her gas agency due to fraud committed by...

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today declined to hear an appeal filed by...

Appointments for the Tribunals have been made according to the recommendations of Search cum Selection Committee: Center tells SC

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Union Government has filed an affidavit in Apex Court,in the matter...

Delhi High Court issues notice to state govt on minor’s plea seeking permission to donate part of liver to his ailing father

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today sought the response of AAP Government on...

Delhi HC pulls up Kejriwal govt for its lethargic attitude in giving forest clearance for completion of 100-bedded hospital in Najafgarh

New Delhi Sept 15 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court, on Wednesday, pulled up the state Government over...

NGT forms five member committee to check the legality of construction raised by Omex Ltd and other developers in “The Lake” and other projects...

New Delhi, Sept 15, (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal -principal bench on Monday constituted a five-member joint Committee...

Allahabad HC upholds single judge order, paving way for recruitment of 68,500 assistant teachers in Uttar Pradesh

Allahabad Sept 15 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday, refused to interfere with the decision of...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you