Courts Update Delhi HC upholds conviction of a person who sexually...

Delhi HC upholds conviction of a person who sexually assaulted a three-and-a-half-year-old child


New Delhi Aug 13(ILNS): The Delhi High Court on Tuesday has upheld the decision of the Trial Court convicting a person for sexually assaulting a three-and-a-half-year-old child while stating that the testimony of the child victim is trustworthy, reliable, and admissible.

A Single Judge Bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri said, “A perusal of the statements of the child victim recorded during the investigation as well as in trial would show that she had consistently stated that the appellant had removed her underwear as well as his own underwear and thereafter, put his penis in her mouth. This Court, in view of the analysis done hereinabove, is of the opinion that the testimony of the child victim is trustworthy, reliable, and admissible.”

The Court was hearing an appeal against the order of the Special Judge convicting the appellant for an offense punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

Reliance was placed on the various decisions of the Apex Court, wherein it has been held that if the testimony of the child victim inspires confidence and is reliable, it is sufficient to record the conviction.

The Bench dismissed the appeal of the appellant and directed the concerned Investigating Officer or the Station House Officer to make efforts to trace out the child victim and her family members and to apprise them about their right to approach the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for seeking compensation under the Victim Compensation Scheme.

In addition, the Bench directed the State to provide requisite compensation to the child victim, in accordance with the aforesaid Scheme, within a period of four weeks from their approaching DLSA.

The appellant was charge-sheeted under Section 6 of the POCSO Act in connection with an FIR registered against him by the mother of the child victim, alleging that the appellant took her daughter to his house and sexually assaulted her.  

The Delhi High Court said, “As per Section 29 of the POCSO Act, there is a presumption regarding guilt of the accused. The burden of proof on the prosecution is not beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecution has to lay down and prove the fundamental facts regarding the guilt of the accused. Once such facts are proved, the onus is upon the accused to lead evidence to rebut the presumption. The appellant has failed to dislodge the statutory presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act.”

The Trial Court, vide order date January 18, 2020, sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of fourteen years, along with payment of a fine of Rs. 10,000/-; and to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months, in default whereof./ILNS/KR/SNG


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi High Court issues notice to Centre, Defence Ministry on plea challenging curbs on strike by defence personnel

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought response from the Centre and...

Allahabad High Court directs shifting of monkeys to forest within three months for creating upheaval in Varanasi city

Allahabad Sept 16 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has directed to shift the monkeys who created upheaval in Varanasi city,...

Madhya Pradesh High Court disposes of PIL seeking legal action against illegal medical practitioners in Shahdol district

Bhopal Sept 16 (ILNS) The Madhya Pradesh High Court has disposed of a PIL seeking legal action...

CJI Ramana hauls up Centre over forced retirement of NCLAT chairperson

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Thursday came down heavily on...

Delhi High Court directs UIDAI, RBI, Google India Digital Services Private Ltd to respond to PIL alleging unauthorised storage of Aadhaar, banking information by...

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court asked the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), RBI...

Supreme Court refuses PILs on Covid-19 measures due to delay in their listing

New Delhi Sept 16 The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain two PILs seeking directions to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you