Courts Update Delhi HC upholds Air Force HR policy, dismisses plea...

Delhi HC upholds Air Force HR policy, dismisses plea from women wing commanders


New Delhi, Jun 12 (ILNS): The Delhi High Court has dismissed a batch of pleas by Women Wing Commander’s India Air Force against the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, which had refused to grant any interim protection in their pleas challenging the HR Policy decision and to grant them Permanent Commission.

Before the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench New Delhi, the petitioners, on June 3, challenged the HR Policy of January 16, 2019, by which they were denied permanent commission. The Tribunal, on June 4, had refused to grant them any interim protection, against which they moved the Delhi High Court.

The Delhi High Court opined that having participated in the selection process in terms of the HR Policy 2019, the same cannot be challenged. As in terms of the said policy, the petitioners were considered for grant of permanent commission in 2019 and 2020, and they were considered again in 2021, however, on all three occasions were found unfit for the grant of the Permanent Commission. Aggrieved by the order dated May 24, 2021 refusing to grant Permanent Commission, the petitioners approached the Tribunal on June 3.

A Special Vacation bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Asha Menon noted that the petitioners have also participated in the consideration process for grant of Permanent Commission in terms of the HR Policy of 2019. “Therefore, prima facie there appears to be not only considerable delay in filing of the petitions before the learned Tribunal but also the petitioners may be considered as estopped from challenging the retrospective application of the HR Policy of the respondents, having participated in the selection process in terms thereof,” held by the Delhi High Court.

The Delhi High Court made it clear that, “any observation made by us in the present order will not in any manner prejudice either party in the petitions pending before the learned Tribunal.”

The Counsel for petitioners has submitted before the High Court that they have been unfairly denied the grant of Permanent Commission without assigning any reason for the same. She further submitted that even if a relief is later granted to the petitioners at later stage, the petitioners may suffer prejudice in form of seniority and rank.

The Delhi High Court relied on its previous order wherein it had dismissed a similar plea (Wg. Cdr. Nidhi Badhani Vs Union of India & Ors., WP(C) 5871/2021) on interim protection by observing:

“8. Once the position in law is as aforesaid, i.e. that by interim order none can be permitted to occupy a public office and once the balance of convenience is in favour of the respondents and not in favour of the petitioner, inasmuch as the petitioner if ultimately succeeds can always be reinstated to the same position, no perversity is found in the impugned order of AFT.

  1. The counsel for the petitioner contends that reinstatement in service would cause difficulties to the petitioner. However neither are the said difficulties described nor is the counsel for the petitioner, on our asking, also able to enumerate the same.” ILNS\KR\SJ\RJ


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Allahabad High Court directs shifting of monkeys to forest within three months for creating upheaval in Varanasi city

Allahabad Sept 16 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has directed to shift the monkeys who created upheaval in Varanasi city,...

Madhya Pradesh High Court disposes of PIL seeking legal action against illegal medical practitioners in Shahdol district

Bhopal Sept 16 (ILNS) The Madhya Pradesh High Court has disposed of a PIL seeking legal action...

CJI Ramana hauls up Centre over forced retirement of NCLAT chairperson

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Thursday came down heavily on...

Delhi High Court directs UIDAI, RBI, Google India Digital Services Private Ltd to respond to PIL alleging unauthorised storage of Aadhaar, banking information by...

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court asked the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), RBI...

Supreme Court refuses PILs on Covid-19 measures due to delay in their listing

New Delhi Sept 16 The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain two PILs seeking directions to...

Supreme Court permits symbolic immersion of Ganesh idols, flays Centre for not abiding by Telangana High Court order

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Supreme Court has allowed the symbolic immersion of Ganesh Idol this...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you