Courts Update Delhi HC expresses displeasure over prolonged sealing of Nizamuddin...

Delhi HC expresses displeasure over prolonged sealing of Nizamuddin Markaz as center cites trans-border implication for opening it

-

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Ministry of Home Affairs, on Monday, filed an affidavit before the Delhi High Court opposing the re-opening of Nizamuddin Markaz in the national capital for public entry, as the premises is part of an ongoing probe in respect of cases having ‘trans-border implication and diplomatic consideration’.

The Single Bench comprised of Justice Mukta Gupta, while hearing a plea filed by the Delhi Waqf Board demanding the opening of the Markaz, which has been closed since March 31 last year following a congregation of Tablighi Jamat at the premises amid Covid-19, expressed displeasure over prolonged sealing of the said premises.

The Centre has submitted that- “The present premises has been kept under lock and key in view of the fact that the organizers of Markaz and the masjid are itself under investigation.”

Claiming that around 1300 foreigners were found at the Markaz  and that cases against them have cross border implications, it is stated thus: “In view of the seriousness of the case which has trans-border implication and diplomatic consideration, it is just and necessary that the case property in such a case is preserved in letter and spirit so that due process of law in dealing with such cases is followed.”In addition, it is submitted that the restriction on the Waqf’s right under Article 26 of the Constitution is imposed on public order considerations on the ground that the said premises were not being used in accordance with the law. The Centre has further challenged the maintainability of the petition on the ground that the power to take any legal action in respect of the premises vest with the lessee and not with the Delhi Waqf Board.

The Bench issued notice upon an impleadment application moved by Masjid Bangle Wali and Madarsa Kashif-ul-Uloom and slated the matter for November 16, 2021.

The petition, filed through Advocate Wajeeh Shafiq, sought directions to the respondent to reassess the necessity of keeping the Waqf premises available for operation as a religious place. 

According to the petitioner, the premises situated at Hazrat Nizamuddin is a Waqf property comprising a mosque, a madrasa, and a hostel, and is locked since March 31, 2020.

The petitioner urged that the Markaz be reopened as its fundamental right to worship is being violated. Even if the Government needs to investigate or wants to retain the place as a piece of evidence, they can do so. No resistance will be offered to the magistrate or any investigating officer visiting the site, the petitioner contended./ILNS/BG/KR/SNG

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi HC expresses displeasure over prolonged sealing of Nizamuddin Markaz as center cites trans-border implication for opening it

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Ministry of Home Affairs, on Monday, filed an affidavit before the Delhi...

Delhi HC adjourns Mehbooba Mufti PMLA hearing to Sept 30, Centre to seek transfer of case to SC

New Delhi Sept 14 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today adjourned its hearing in the plea of...

Supreme Court says Nagaraj judgment already decided policy for determining backwardness, no need to revisit it again

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court today said it is not going to decide again policy,...

Khori Gaon: Faridabad municipal corporation assures Supreme Court of completing rehabilitation by April 30, 2022

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court today heard a plea seeking rehabilitation for the Jhuggi dwellers...

Allahabad High Court refuses to intervene in PIL seeking stay on demolition of small temples in Vindhyachal temple corridor

Allahabad Sept 14(ILNS): The Allahabad High Court on Monday, refused to intervene on a PIL seeking a...

Supreme Court says life imprisonment means rigorous imprisonment for life, dismisses SLP

New Delhi Sept 14(ILNS): The Supreme Court has held that the sentence of life imprisonment has to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you