Breaking News Delhi court frames charges against 5 men for unlawful...

Delhi court frames charges against 5 men for unlawful assembly, rioting, murder

-

New Delhi, Nov 1 (ILNS) A Delhi court today framed charges against five men for unlawful assembly, rioting and the murder of four people, who were brought to GTB Hospital and declared brought dead. It was found that these four had been injured during the communal riots that had erupted in Northeast Delhi on February 24, 2020, subsequent to the violence that broke out surrounding the anti-CAA protests.

Additional Sessions Judge Virender Bhat framed charges against all five men, namely Ashok Kumar, Ajay @Monu, Subham, Arif @Mota, and Jitender Kumar. Charges under Sections 144 (joining unlawful assembly armed with a deadly weapon), 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with a deadly weapon) and 149 (unlawful assembly) and Section 302 (murder), Section 149 read with Section 34 IPC were levelled against the four accused.

“It appears that the accused developed the common intention to kill those people at the spur of the moment during the riotous clashes between their community and the person belonging to another community,” the bench noted while framing charges against the accused.

The bench stated, “There is no escape from the conclusion at this stage that the accused were members of an unlawful assembly, the object of which was to cause riots, vandalism, destruction of property etc. and were part of the riotous mob which killed the deceased, Zakir. They were identified by the eyewitness and have been specifically named by him. Electronic evidence produced along with the charge sheet shows their presence at the place of incident and in the mob.”

Although, no charge of criminal conspiracy was made against the accused persons as there was no material on record to suggest that the deceased Zakir was killed in pursuance of any conspiracy hatched by the accused.

Further, the bench concluded, “The material on record prima-facie discloses commission of the offence of rioting, murder etc. by the accused. It is evident that if the evidence collected during the course of the investigation and annexed to the charge sheet remains unrebutted the conviction of the accused is reasonably possible. No case for their discharge has been made out,” the court observed,

The bench observed, “When the eye witness reached the main road, he saw a large number of Hindus gathered near Chawla Store outside Gali No. 10 main Brijpuri Road and a crowd consisting of Muslims near Farooqui Masjid on the side of Brijpuri Pulia who were raising slogans against the CAA/NRC and were armed with weapon rods, swords etc. The Hindus in the crowd were also armed with rods, scissors, swords etc. He knew some of those namely Monu, Deepak, Subham, Rahul, Jitender, Praveen etc. He knew Arif @ Mota who was present in the crowd consisting of Muslims and was leading them,”

When the Muslims outnumbered Hindus, the latter retracted and the Muslim rioters set ablaze the houses and shops belonging to Hindus. They also beat some boys near Chawla Store. He stated that when he reached the police picket near Aggarwal Sweet with the help of the police, he saw that some rioters had caught hold of a boy and were beating him mercilessly with rods, stones, kicks, fists etc. and that boy fell down injured on that very spot.”

The court found the arguments to be baseless “As per the site plan placed on record along with charge-sheet, there is a distance of approximately 100 meters only between the spot near Gali No.10 and Brijpuri Pulia, hence any person with a mobile phone even if standing within the radial distance of more than 100 meters from any mobile phone tower would catch the signal from that tower which implies that any person with a mobile phone standing near Gali No. 10 would definitely catch the signal from the mobile phone tower erected near or around Brijpuri Pulia. Hence, the presence of the witness at the spot of the incident cannot be doubted at this stage merely on the basis of his location which comes out from the analysis of the CDR of his mobile phone,”

As per the case of the prosecution four persons namely Mehtab S/o Sh.Munna Khan, Ashfaq Hussain   S/o Sh Agaz Hussain, Zakir S/o Sh. Shabbir Ahmad and Jamil S/o Sh. Samsul Haq was brought to GTB Hospital on 26.02.2020 in the evening hours in an injured and unconscious state. Upon examination by the Doctors, all the four were declared brought dead. Upon local inquiry, it was found that these four persons had got injured during communal riots that had erupted in North-East, Delhi on February 24, 2020, subsequent to Anti CAA protests. Accordingly, an FIR was registered at PS Dayalpur on February 28, 2020./ILNS/SNG/IL/

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi court frames charges against 5 men for unlawful assembly, rioting, murder

New Delhi, Nov 1 (ILNS) A Delhi court today framed charges against five men for unlawful assembly,...

Need to ensure legal protection to marginalised sections of society: Justice UU Lalit

New Delhi, Nov 1, (ILNS) There is a need is to ensure legal protection to the marginalised...

Allahabad High Court directs all district courts in Uttar Pradesh to ensure orders are written legibly or typed, else face departmental action

Allahabad, Nov 1 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court today directed the District Judge concerned to issue standing...

Uttrakhand HC issues notice to Centre, state government on media reports of illegal construction in Corbett National Park,

Dehradun, Nov 1 (ILNS) The Uttarakhand High Court on October 27, took Suo Moto cognizance and issued...

Delhi HC dismisses plea of cracker sellers against pollution control committee order banning storage, sale of crackers for Diwali

New Delhi, Nov 1 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court today dismissed a plea as withdrawn filed by...

Bombay HC set aside the order passed by State Excise minister on revision application of a liquor licence for Sports Club

Mumbai, Nov 1 (ILNS) The Bombay High Court, recently (October 25)  while disposing of a Public Interest Litigation...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you