Courts Update Covid treatment: Delhi HC asks Centre about Tocilizumab availability,...

Covid treatment: Delhi HC asks Centre about Tocilizumab availability, alternative cocktail


New Delhi, May 14 (ILNS): As a brother of a patient complained that he is not being able to get the drug Tocilizumab 400 MG for his brother suffering from SARS-Cov 2, the Delhi High Court today sought a response from Central government on some questions in the matter of supply and availability of the drug.

The drug Tocilizumab is in extreme short supply in the country and is one of the essential drugs being prescribed in the treatment of COVID-19.

The questions revolve around when will the drug (it is now being imported) be authorised to be used, and why India cannot manufacture the drug in India?

The questions are:

i) Whether the demand for Tocilizumab 400 mg would be reduced, if the new antibody cocktail of Casirivimab and Imdevimab now approved for emergency use and authorisation, is supplied by Roche? If so, what quantities would be required of the said antibody cocktail?
ii) If Tocilizumab 400 mg is required for COVID-19 patients, how does it intend to obtain the supplies of the said drug through Roche India, or through its global manufacturers, namely F Hoffman- La Roche Ltd, Switzerland at M/s Chugai Seiyaku Kabushki Kaisha, Japan?
iii) When are the results for the Phase III trials for the drug Tocilizumab, which was approved on May 12, 2021, in favour of two Indian companies – M/s Hetero Biopharma Ltd, and M/s JSS Medical Research India Pvt. Ltd, expected and details of the applicable guidelines?

The questions were asked by the Bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh, while hearing the petition by the brother of the patient in question. The patient is admitted in Malik Radix Health Care Hospital, Nirman Vihar, New Delhi. The petitioner is not getting a prescribed dose of Tocilizumab 400 MG, despite multiple efforts made by him. The Court has asked the government why that drug cannot be manufactured in India.

Though the original petitioner was provided this drug by the government, later the Court had impleaded one more applicant/patient, Ms Kamlesh Gupta as Petitioner No 2, who was also prescribed Tocilizumab 400 MG, but despite repeated efforts, the same was not made available to her.

Counsel for the Union of India and the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) have assured the Court that they will, in their best effort, provide medicine to the petitioner. Today, the Counsel for Ms Gupta submitted that as the patient is stable now, she no more needs Tocilizumab.

Complying with the directions passed by the Court on May 10, three affidavits have been emailed to the court master-
• On behalf of Roche Products (India) Pvt Ltd
• On behalf of the Deputy Drugs Controller (India);
• On behalf of the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks,
All these have been received, perused and taken on record by the Court.

Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Counsel for Roche India along with Ruby Singh Ahuja, submitted that the consignment of 45,000 Tocilizumab 80 mg vials, to cater to 9,000 patients, have arrived in India last week, as assured to the court. This is in the form of a humanitarian aid that has been extended by Roche.

In fact, as per the affidavit filed by Roche, 100,000 vials of Tocilizumab 80 mg, catering to 20,000 doses, has already been imported by Roche India, prior to the stipulated date of May 15, and the same is scheduled to reach the distributor, M/s Cipla Ltd, today. This has been confirmed by Ms Sahadev, Counsel appearing for M/s Cipla Ltd.

Mr Kaul, Senior Counsel, also highlighted the fact that in so far as licensing issues of the said drug are concerned, the Union of India has taken a stand before the Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (In Re : Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services) during Pandemic that the question of voluntary or compulsory licences for the said drug, and the invocation of the provisions of the Patents Act, 1970 is a policy decision, and the Government of India is currently dealing with the said issue at a global level, through diplomatic channels. He submitted that the Union of India’s stand in the said affidavit is that any invocation of these provisions, at this stage, would be counter-productive to the interests of India.

Mr Kunal Tandon, Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, pointed out that the Supreme Court’s order dated April 30, 2021, in In Re: Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services during Pandemic (supra), clearly upholds the power of granting licences, which are to be resorted to by the Government, in public interest. He also submitted that contrary to the last order dated May 10, 2021, passed by this court, the global manufacturing and production details of the drug- Tocilizumab have not been placed by record by Roche India.

Mr Tandon further highlighted the fact that there is an enormous demand for Tocilizumab 400 mg, and doctors have been prescribing the same qua patients suffering from COVID-19, as is clear from the case of the two patients who are Petitioners before this Court itself. He finally submitted that the shortage of the said drug has resulted in high prices as the drug is being sold in black market.

Archana Sahadeva, Counsel appearing for Cipla Ltd, pointed out that the Clinical Guidelines for the management of Adult COVID-19 patient protocol, that has been issued by ICMR on 22th April, 2021 has prescribed Remdesivir, Tocilizumab and Convalescent plasma as three drugs which can be used on a EUA/ Off label basis for the treatment/management of COVID-19 patients, in certain specific circumstances. The ICMR could consider revising the said Guidance protocols, in case of presence of an alternative for the said drugs, if required.

Mr. Kaul has further submitted that the said company has to also cater to the global demands of this drug, as this drug is also meant for treating Rheumatoid Arthritis. He has submitted that the next consignment of 1 lacs doses will be in India by the end of May.
On the question raised by Court that how many patients will get their complete dose of this drug from this 1 lacks doses of this consignment, Counsel for Roche India replied that it is for 1 lacks people.

After going through all the affidavits filed and submissions made by the parties Court has observed that the stand of the importer M/s.Roche India, who enjoys the licence of the manufacturer, in India, is that there is no certainty in respect to the further imports of the said drug- Tocilizumab that are to be made to India. The unequivocal stand of Roche India is clearl that more imports and supply of Tocilizumab in India would only be endeavoured upon, and there is no clear assurance or undertaking to meet the required market demand, despite there being patients who are willing to pay for the medicine.

The amended writ petition was taken on record by the Court, which further instructed that the Union of India (UOI) have to file an affidavit, at least two days before the next day of hearing. The Court listed the matter for further hearing on May 27. ILNS\KR\SJ\RJ


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

No pilot licence, no permission required for micro drones: Govt proposes simpler Drone Rules, 2021

New Delhi, Jul 16 (ILNS) The Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) has released the updated – The...

PIL in Delhi High Court:EVMs can be hacked, replace it by ballot paper during forthcoming UP elections

New Delhi, Jul 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court Today, adjourned the hearing of a matter seeking to...

COVID-19: SC extends prisoners parole till further orders

New Delhi, Jul 16(ILNS)The Supreme Court today extended the release of prisoners on parole to de...

Supreme Court directs UP govt to reconsider allowing Kanwar Yatra

New Delhi, Jul 16(ILNS) The Supreme Court today gave yet another chance to the state of Uttar...

Kerala Assembly vandalism 2015: Supreme Court reserves judgment

New Delhi, Jul 16(ILNS) The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its judgment on a plea filed by...

SC pulls up UPSC, Jharkhand PSC for violating DGP appointment rules

The Supreme Court has directed the Union Public Service Commission and the Jharkhand Public Service Commission to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you