Courts Update Calcutta HC tells authorities to inspect mobile tower...

Calcutta HC tells authorities to inspect mobile tower installed on roof of senior citizen


Kolkata, May 14 (ILNS): The Calcutta High Court has directed the concerned authorities to inspect the health and condition of the mobile tower installed on the roof of the building of the petitioner, a senior citizen.

The Single-Judge Bench of Justice Bibek Chaudhuri on May 12 dispsed of the petition and held that the petitioner has not raised any grievance with regard to the agreement in question. There is no dispute between the parties, which can be referred to the arbitration.

The petitioner said that she only wants an expert’s report regarding the health and condition of the mobile tower, fixed by a private respondent in 2008. The petitioner, a resident within the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and a tax payer, can pray for such direction upon the authorities to protect her residential house, life and property of its inmates.

The Bench said: “Considering such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of, directing the concerned authorities to inspect the mobile tower set up on the roof of the premises in question within 30 days from the date of communication of this order and submit a report to the petitioner.”

The petition was filed by one Rama Paul. According to the petitioner by an agreement dated June 23, 2008, the private respondent was permitted to install a mobile tower on the roof of her building.

Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury, Counsel for the petitioner, alleged that due to the failure on part of the private respondents from doing proper repairing work of the mobile tower, the condition of the tower becomes dangerous to human habitation, it may fall on the roof at any point of time, causing danger to human life and habitation of the said house, as well as the neighbouring area.

It was also alleged by the petitioner that she made an application before the concerned authorities for an inspection to consider the health of the said mobile tower, but the authorities did not inspect the premises in question till date.

Manas Kumar Kundu, Advocate for the state on the other hand, submitted that there was no privity of contract between the petitioner and the municipal corporation and private respondent at the time of agreement.

The dispute between the parties essentially related to non-payment of rent. Therefore, the petition is not maintainable and the petitioner can have proper remedy by filing a civil suit. Furthermore, the agreement in question has an arbitration clause and over dispute between the parties, the matter should be referred to the arbitration. ILNS/SHV/SS/RJ


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

NCDRC enhanced the cost imposed on Hinduja Hospital from Rs 25,000 to Rs 3,51,000 for negligent services

New Delhi, Jul 17(ILNS) The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) enhanced the cost of Rs 25000/...

Allahabad HC issues notice to BCI on a PIL seeking to re-frame rules re advocates dress code as per the weather of the country.

Allahabad, Jul 17(ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has issued a notice to the Central Government, BCI and to...

2 defeated BJP candidates file election pleas before Calcutta HC

Kolkata, Jul 17 (ILNS): The Calcutta High Court has issued notices on the...

NGT directs remedial action against DSP Associates, Sonipat for illegal mining and diverting flow of river

New Delhi, Jul 17 (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal has issued directions to the Ministry of Environment,...

Rajasthan High Court orders suspension of cop for separating inter-caste married couple

Jodhpur, Jul 17 (ILNS) The Rajasthan High Court has ordered suspension of a policeman for separating an...

No pilot licence, no permission required for micro drones: Govt proposes simpler Drone Rules, 2021

New Delhi, Jul 16 (ILNS) The Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) has released the updated – The...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you