Breaking News Allahabad HC issues notice to UP govt on demolition...

Allahabad HC issues notice to UP govt on demolition of 100-yr-old Gareeb Nawaz Mosque

-

Allahabad, Jun 23 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court today issued notice to the state government and others on a writ petition filed by the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board, challenging the demolition of 100-year-old Gareeb Nawaz Mosque in Barabanki district of the state by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate.

“These petitions, prima facie, raise important questions on the existence of a Mosque on public utility land, if it is so. Also with regard to exercise of power by state authorities and other related provisions, its scope, especially the allegations of malafide exercise of power and the manner in which it has been done, as alleged by the petitioners,” Justices Saurabh Lavania and Rajan Roy observed.

The court held, “It is said that the officer even went to the extent of changing the order initially passed by him on April 3, as on a bare perusal of the contents thereof wherein there was a reference to the proceedings held on April 9, it was apparently ante-dated and realising this error, he made changes in the said order and passed another order on April 12 in an attempt to justify his action whereas in fact the said orders were passed without any opportunity of hearing to the concerned committee of management of the Mosque.

“Not only this, the officer went to the extent of uploading the said order, which in fact, had been passed under the provisions of CrPC on the website of the board of revenue, where only the orders passed by the revenue courts are uploaded,” the court observed.

The writ petitions were filed challenging the orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ram Sanehi Ghat Tehsil, Barabanki district and the action taken in pursuance thereof in proceedings under Section 133 CrPC by which, as alleged, a Mosque existing in Banikodar village of Ram Sanehi Ghat Tehsil in Barabanki district for the past 100 years, where people of the area pray, has been demolished.

The petition further alleged that in addition to the Mosque, certain other constructions have been demolished.

According to the Counsel for the petitioners, the petitions raised various questions as to the scope and exercise of power under Section 133 CrPC, including malafide exercise of power by the then Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Ram Sanehighat, Barabanki, who has been arrayed by name and who used to reside just across the ‘Masjid’ and had certain grievances with regard to the ‘azaan’ being called from the loudspeaker and which in fact was redressed and the use of loudspeakers was discontinued, but according to Petitioners this did not satisfy the said officer who abused the power vested in him by passing arbitrary orders under Section 133 CrPC in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in him and he ensured demolition of mosque in gross abuse of law.

Jaideep Narayan Mathur, Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that while doing so the officer concerned not only dwelt on the question of title of the land over which the mosque existed but also on validity of the registration of the mosque etc. as Waqf under the relevant Waqf Act which in fact he did not have jurisdiction to do in proceedings under 133 CrPC. He submitted that questions of title and possession cannot be decided in such proceedings under section 133 CrPC.

It is alleged that the Senior authorities were mute spectators to the gross abuse of power and violation of rule of law by the said officer. The entire exercise according to the petitioners has hurt the sentiments of a large section of society including the petitioners and there is grave discontent at such abuse of power.

The Court observed that that counsel for petitioner has taken us through the contents of the petition filed by the Waqf Board as also the reliefs claimed herein. He has submitted that no doubt that against an order passed under Section 133 CrPC a revision lies under CrPC but considering the blatant misuse and abuse of power by the authority concerned that too for malafide reasons and the manner in which the constitutional scheme and rule of law has been violated it raises important questions touching upon the exercise of such power by State authorities violating valuable rights including constitutional rights of the citizens.

The plea is that senior authorities have also turned a blind eye to the arbitrary actions. He also says that not only the mosque etc. have been demolished but its bricks which were proof of the time when the mosque had been constructed had been thrown in the river on the directions of the aforesaid officer.

The court asked advocate Mathur as to what was the nature or category of land on which the Mosque, as alleged, existed, who was its owner? In this regard Mathur replied that certain consolidation records of 1960’s wherein said land is mentioned as ‘Abadi’ though Masjid is also mentioned.

The court further asked the advocate as to how the Mosque was constructed on Abadi land, The counsel for petitioner submitted that it had been constructed 100 years ago, however, he was unable, as of now, to show any documentary proof in this regard to justify the same, whether of the period prior to the date of vesting as per the UPZALR Act, 1950 such as Revenue Records of 1356 F or thereafter (Revenue Records of 1359 F, Basic year khatauni of Consolidation) or for that matter any other document.

The court pointed that if the relief for restoration of mosque is to be considered in these proceedings, assuming that the occasion so arises, then, the fact that the mosque validly existed on the land in question would have to be established and that this issue may also fall for consideration in the context of other reliefs claimed,

The counsel appearing in another connected matter referred to concept of ‘Waqf by user’ but submitted that they would not enter into complicated questions of title and would not raise the same in these proceedings and would confine their grievance to the relief claimed against the arbitrary, illegal and blatant exercise of power under section 133 and claim for compensation for the same.

Therefore, leaving all pleas open for consideration, the court issued notice to the respondents in the Writ Petitions, “in addition to the normal mode of service, shall also be served through the Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary Appointment, Government of U.P, as it is said that he has been transferred elsewhere after the incident”, the order reads. The court hears the matter on July 23. ILNS/AP/SS/SJ/SNG

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

NCDRC enhanced the cost imposed on Hinduja Hospital from Rs 25,000 to Rs 3,51,000 for negligent services

New Delhi, Jul 17(ILNS) The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) enhanced the cost of Rs 25000/...

Allahabad HC issues notice to BCI on a PIL seeking to re-frame rules re advocates dress code as per the weather of the country.

Allahabad, Jul 17(ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has issued a notice to the Central Government, BCI and to...

2 defeated BJP candidates file election pleas before Calcutta HC

Kolkata, Jul 17 (ILNS): The Calcutta High Court has issued notices on the...

NGT directs remedial action against DSP Associates, Sonipat for illegal mining and diverting flow of river

New Delhi, Jul 17 (ILNS) The National Green Tribunal has issued directions to the Ministry of Environment,...

Rajasthan High Court orders suspension of cop for separating inter-caste married couple

Jodhpur, Jul 17 (ILNS) The Rajasthan High Court has ordered suspension of a policeman for separating an...

No pilot licence, no permission required for micro drones: Govt proposes simpler Drone Rules, 2021

New Delhi, Jul 16 (ILNS) The Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) has released the updated – The...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you