Breaking News Allahabad HC issues notice to BCI on a PIL...

Allahabad HC issues notice to BCI on a PIL seeking to re-frame rules re advocates dress code as per the weather of the country.


Allahabad, Jul 17(ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has issued a notice to the Central Government, BCI and to the registrar of its own court, on a PIL filed by a lawyer challenging the circular issued by the High Court through which black gowns/coats were made mandatory for lawyers appearing before it.

The petitioner, Ashok Pandey, also sought a direction to the Bar Council of India to frame rules prescribing dress code for advocates considering the weather in the country.  

A division bench of Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay and Justice Ajai Kumar Srivastava directed the Central Government, Bar Council of India and Allahabad High Court to file their response in the matter.

The petitioner has moved the court with a rather unique prayer saying that judges of all the courts, tribunals, authorities, or any other person should be prohibited from adhering to the dress code prescribed for advocates by the BCI rules, 1975 and declare the provisions contained in chapter IV of the BCI rules, 1975 rules for dress-code for advocates as ultra-vires to the fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 21 and 25 of the Constitution and also against the spirit of provisions contained u/s 49(1) (gg) of the Advocates Act, 1961. 

The petitioner is an advocate, who is also the president of Hindu Personal Law Board and chairman of Global Human Rights Organizations. The petitioner states that India is a tropical country having high temperature for a whole year and asking an advocate to wear a coat, gown, and necktie cannot be said to be a proper dress. Further compelling the advocates to wear gowns in crunching heat violates the fundamental rights of the advocates.

It is also stated that the petitioner follows Sanatan Dharma and is having objection in wearing the band for its reason being a symbol of Christianity and being worn by church priests. He further states that this system was first adopted by barristers in England and extended to advocates in India.

The petitioner also states his personal experience when he was appearing before the Lucknow bench of Justice Rituraj Awasthi and Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh at Allahabad High Court who asked him to wear black coat otherwise his case will be dismissed. The petitioner, however, showed them the BCI circular about the exemption in dress code due to summer, upon several requests of hearing or adjournment the bench denied it and the petitioner had to wear some other advocate’s coat.

The petitioner further states that “wearing white sari/ salwar kameej is symbol of widow ladies as per the Hindu culture and tradition, so there is no application of mind on the part of BCB (i.e. Bar Council of Bharat) while making the rule impugned.”

The matter is listed for August 18 for further hearing./ILNS/GM/SNG/


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Delhi High Court issues notice to Centre, Defence Ministry on plea challenging curbs on strike by defence personnel

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought response from the Centre and...

Allahabad High Court directs shifting of monkeys to forest within three months for creating upheaval in Varanasi city

Allahabad Sept 16 (ILNS) The Allahabad High Court has directed to shift the monkeys who created upheaval in Varanasi city,...

Madhya Pradesh High Court disposes of PIL seeking legal action against illegal medical practitioners in Shahdol district

Bhopal Sept 16 (ILNS) The Madhya Pradesh High Court has disposed of a PIL seeking legal action...

CJI Ramana hauls up Centre over forced retirement of NCLAT chairperson

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Thursday came down heavily on...

Delhi High Court directs UIDAI, RBI, Google India Digital Services Private Ltd to respond to PIL alleging unauthorised storage of Aadhaar, banking information by...

New Delhi Sept 16 (ILNS) The Delhi High Court asked the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), RBI...

Supreme Court refuses PILs on Covid-19 measures due to delay in their listing

New Delhi Sept 16 The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain two PILs seeking directions to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you